PDA

View Full Version : Department of STATE? what IS this shit???


mrvette
11-30-2011, 1:45pm
Dakota Myer the CMH winner nobam pinned some weeks ago?? they are killing him now with mental problems over some sniper rifles being exported to PAKISTAN and so personal Alinski attacks ensue to HIM now, when he complains to his employer.....the exporting company....when OUR guys can't get that hot shit in the field....

SO, It comes out that STATE DEPT decides what .mil tech gets exported and to who!@!!!!!@#!%#!~

talk about shit stupid, the GOD DAMN LAST GROUP IN DC to be informed over ANYTHING like that should be foggy bottom/State Dept.......

that is a DOD decision.....

this nation is run by idiots!!#$#!%%#

AND it does fit right in with the PROGRESSIVE agenda and the Alinski tactics employed again our CMH winner.....just like they did the testifying agents in on the gun runner operation.....

same as Cain.....


:beat::beat::leaving:

Scissors
11-30-2011, 2:16pm
Someone get me a mrvette-to-English translator.

Yerf Dog
11-30-2011, 2:17pm
Someone get me a mrvette-to-English translator.

Get in line.

Scissors
11-30-2011, 2:20pm
Wait...so let me get this straight. Are you arguing for the federal government telling a private business who it can and cannot sell to?

Yerf Dog
11-30-2011, 2:22pm
Medal of Honor recipient sues former employer - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/medal-honor-recipient-sues-former-employer-222936603.html)

Scissors
11-30-2011, 2:23pm
The progressive agenda, as conservatives have explained it to me, includes increasing government control/restrictions on private industry.

Mrvette is supporting government control/restriction on this private industry.

Ergo, Mrvette is part of the progressive agenda.

jaxgator
11-30-2011, 2:47pm
Sounds to me like he's condemning the State Department.

Scissors
11-30-2011, 3:19pm
Sounds to me like he's condemning the State Department.

...for not using federal power to block a private company's sales.

Scissors
11-30-2011, 3:45pm
I take it this being more the issue than the sale of items:

I agree.

mrvette
11-30-2011, 4:10pm
Wait...so let me get this straight. Are you arguing for the federal government telling a private business who it can and cannot sell to?

YES< you sell DOD goods to who EVER that is at BEST not true to our position....and all THEY get to do is get the US DEPARTMENT OF STATE to agree to the sale..??? BULLSHIT@!@#$!@! that shit done on DOD dime, they pay to develop and R&D the shit, you GOD DAMN RIGHT DOD should control where and WHO it goes to....

**** STATE department.....


Our STATE department is a total cluster **** , and I know from the inside starting decades ago when I was in high school......personally....

:sadangel:

mrvette
11-30-2011, 4:14pm
The progressive agenda, as conservatives have explained it to me, includes increasing government control/restrictions on private industry.

Mrvette is supporting government control/restriction on this private industry.

Ergo, Mrvette is part of the progressive agenda.

Private industry does damn little in the way of DEFENSE R&D they don't get DOD money for funding.....

so that money paid for the weapon systems we as AMERICANS developed....and so therefore OUR DOD should have control over who/what/where/quantity every damn .22 long rifle ammo goes to....

****ing STATE department has NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!!!!....jeesch....

Scissors, you can be the most obsequious SOB over nothing, you know damn well what I saying.....

quit with the provocateur pose and give it up already.....


:beat::beat::rofl:

Sea Six
12-01-2011, 5:50am
Someone get me a mrvette-to-English translator.

Get in line.

I gave up trying to read his posts a long time ago.

When I'm reading a thread and get to one of his posts, I just scroll right past it.

It just isn't worth it.

:dunno:

Scissors
12-01-2011, 8:56am
YES

So you're pro-communism/socialism in this respect.

Just wanted to make sure.

BAE Systems, by the way, is not a U.S. company.

Scissors
12-01-2011, 8:59am
Scissors, you can be the most obsequious SOB over nothing, you know damn well what I saying.....

quit with the provocateur pose and give it up already.....

:beat::beat::rofl:

Just wanted to post these together again:

Typical liberal, don't debate about the accuracy of the points presented, just try to discredit the source......alinski 101.......

sorry but FAIL:rofl::rofl::rofl:

ASS if anyone would reed the puffington post and bee leave any thing in it....

talk about insipid......

:thumbs:

:rofl:

Scissors
12-01-2011, 9:10am
So, basically, you're against attacking the source, except when you're for it, and you're against Communism and Socialism, except when you're for them. Brilliant! :lol:

mrvette
12-01-2011, 1:01pm
So, basically, you're against attacking the source, except when you're for it, and you're against Communism and Socialism, except when you're for them. Brilliant! :lol:

I note your location, Wash Dc.....you argue like a typical lying politician, you have learned well how to try confusing the issue and it may work for the masses but it don't flush with me.....

don't forget, I spent 40 cognitive years in that town, I know more of it than you do.....


:rofl::rofl::beat::kimblair: