Election Prediction - predict the correct winner and the electoral college total

[Jeff '79]

[Raazor]

Originally Posted by Thomas

[DAB]

[z06psi]

Originally Posted by Thomas

[Jeff '79]

Originally Posted by DAB

you had Biden at 294

Looks like Raazor FTW by 1pt ??

[Dixievet]

Trump needs to concede

[Jeff '79]

Originally Posted by Dixievet

Trump needs to concede

Trump who??
Word is he's broke.
He can't even afford to buy a bus ticket to Mara Lago.
Broke = Inconsequential
Looks like the reality show that his mind lives in is over.

[DAB]

Originally Posted by Jeff '79

Looks like Raazor FTW by 1pt ??

I’m waiting for the Electoral College totals. Dec. 14

[Murray]

When done right these are hilarious

https://fb.watch/1KFOid1wEz/

[snide]

[LisaJohn]

Go Math curriculum.

[Jobaka]

Originally Posted by Murray

When done right these are hilarious

https://fb.watch/1KFOid1wEz/

[FLEXjs]

Originally Posted by Thomas

That is awesome.

[carlton_fritz]

https://recentlyheard.com/2020/11/14...7GWSCPEZqq0BYg

Trey Trainor, Chairman of the Federal Election, said during his speech on Newsmax this Thursday that he “believes that there is electoral fraud” and stated that the failure to allow poll watchers to witness the vote counting procedure – among many other anomalies – would indeed constitute a “illegitimate election.”
“I do agree that there is electoral fraud in these areas,” said Trainor. “Otherwise they will encourage the observers to come in.”
“If you have reports that 10,000 people who do not live in the state of Nevada have voted in Nevada, when you have a video showing that people are either duplicating a spoiled ballot right there, or only marking a blank ballot for an elector, that is a method that must be followed by election monitors,” said Trainor.
The President of the FEC added that poll observers are constitutionally permitted to be present during the counting of the votes, and that if they are denied access to a location where the vote is being tabulated, “the rule is not being followed, making this an unconstitutional referendum.”
BREAKING: Chairman of the Federal Election Commission claims he suspects that the electoral fraud is taking place” and terms this election a “illegitimate” pic.twitter.com/SPCMlzSBWX
—The President-Elect Chads (@thehangingchads) 12 November 2020.
Trainor has estimated that any of the Trump campaign’s legal threats to the validity of the 2020 presidential election will possibly end up before the Supreme Court.
Global File reported to the U.S. this week. House Rep. Lance Gooden filed a complaint surrounding refusals to allow GOP poll watchers to witness the counting of votes in Texas:
On Monday, U.S. Rep. Lance Gooden reported a lawsuit filed against the Dallas County Elections Office, arguing that the office failed to cooperate with local legislation and allowed the Republican Party poll watchers to witness the vote counting process.
“Repeating abuses of the vote counting protocols,” which involved banning Republicans from being present during the mailing process, contributed to a complaint against the Dallas County Elections Office.
“Voters need to see how their votes are tallied,” Gooden said in a press release. “Democratic administrations at any level would do everything to tip the balance in their favour. We won’t let them get away with it.”
In Detroit, poll observers walked up the windows and yelled at the poll observers to leave while the latter chanted “Let’s get in” while locked out of the poll counting area.

[DAB]

thankfully, we have a process to address such shenanigans. Representatives and Senators can challenge the votes from the several states, and if no one has sufficient electoral votes to become president, then the House will choose the president. one vote, one state.

[DAB]

just watched the presser with Guiliani and others...if true, then Trump will be re-elected in some form, either via proper electors on Dec. 14, or in the house on Jan. 5.

so no award of the bowl of uncertainty until we know for certain.

[z06psi]

Originally Posted by DAB

so no award of the bowl of uncertainty until we know for certain.

[Jeff '79]

Originally Posted by DAB

just watched the presser with Guiliani and others...if true, then Trump will be re-elected in some form, either via proper electors on Dec. 14, or in the house on Jan. 5.

so no award of the bowl of uncertainty until we know for certain.

OMG !!!
You believe him ???
All he has is a bunch of has been lawsuits and lies. Every single thing he mentioned has been thrown out in a court of law and is an absolute joke.
There's a reason that three attorney teams have dropped lawsuits and quit.
Why can't Trump hire an election law firm amymore?? There isn't a case.
What exactly did you hear that make you post tnis??

[snide]

[DAB]

Originally Posted by Jeff '79

OMG !!!
You believe him ???
All he has is a bunch of has been lawsuits and lies. Every single thing he mentioned has been thrown out in a court of law and is an absolute joke.
There's a reason that three attorney teams have dropped lawsuits and quit.
Why can't Trump hire an election law firm amymore?? There isn't a case.
What exactly did you hear that make you post tnis??

i watched and listened to almost the whole presser (had a phone call in the middle i had to take, so missed 5 min somewhere), as I said, if this is true, then the vote totals you see now are not correct. they described wide spread, systematic fraud in several states.

i do agree that they are on a tight time frame.

but,

if I was part of the legal planning, while i'd accept the rejection of illegal ballots, and the adjustment of vote totals, that is not likely to happen in the next 4 weeks by any judge.

so if they can delay the certification of the results in some states, then they will certify past the "safe harbor" date of 12/8 (i'm going from memory), and therefore, those state's electoral votes can be challenged in Congress on 1/5, and if the Senate rejects them, then they don't count. if that happens, and no one has 270 votes in Congress, then the voting falls to the state delegations in Congress, one state, one vote. and if that happens, Trump wins.

what they are doing also now is building a case to present to the Senate and the people, so you know why some states should be rejected.