|
Off Topic Off Topic - General non-Corvette related discussion. |
|
Share | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-04-2024, 10:23am | #1 |
Explosive Salami
Stall Owner #1120.2520 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Not Ceasing & Desisting on the leeward side of Anger Island
Posts: 52,704
Thanks: 21,920
Thanked 28,170 Times in 11,910 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $9018209
|
[Bill Daniels] Playing the Trump Card: SC rules CO can't block Trump from the ballot
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to DJ_Critterus For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 10:42am | #2 | ||||||
A Real Barner
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Down the Shore,New Jersey Elev.3 feet.
Posts: 18,682
Thanks: 4,608
Thanked 11,057 Times in 5,171 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $1007997
|
Just saw it.....good decision on their part.....could have spurred an insurrection
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to 04 commemorative For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 10:46am | #3 | ||||||
Barn Stall Owner #112
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Content provider
Posts: 16,959
Thanks: 6,709
Thanked 4,668 Times in 2,744 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $500
|
Wow, actually a common sense decision.
|
||||||
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Yadkin For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 10:46am | #4 | ||||||
10cm member
Barn Stall Owner #90125 NCM Supporter '19,'20
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston, Tejas, Estados Unidos
Posts: 82,399
Thanks: 37,443
Thanked 41,640 Times in 17,333 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2621492
|
Sad we're reduced to celebrating winning a fight that we paid for both sides to wage. We paid the government to do the lawfare, and Trump/Trump supporters paid to defend against it. Good decision, but this isn't winning.
|
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bill For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 10:46am | #5 | ||||||
Barn Stall Owner #123
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: I live my life by 2 rules. 1) Never share everything you know. 2)
Posts: 1,806
Thanks: 120
Thanked 1,943 Times in 869 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $525
|
So when do the AntiFA riots start?
|
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KenHorse For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 11:16am | #6 | ||||||
Barn Stall Owner #14/32
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: IDK, IDC, IDGAF
Posts: 21,650
Thanks: 14,540
Thanked 13,170 Times in 5,011 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $4810
|
A good decision. A little surprised that even the "wise latina" and Miss "I'm not a biologist" were on board with it.
As always though, the left will use this as another excuse to attack & discredit SCOTUS. That effort started to ramp up again last week after the court agreed to hear the presidential immunity arguments. |
||||||
03-04-2024, 11:26am | #7 | ||||||
Vette Barn Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ca
Posts: 715
Thanks: 0
Thanked 970 Times in 419 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $120
|
here comes "pack the court" bullshit again
|
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Swany00 For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 11:35am | #8 | ||||||
10cm member
Barn Stall Owner #90125 NCM Supporter '19,'20
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston, Tejas, Estados Unidos
Posts: 82,399
Thanks: 37,443
Thanked 41,640 Times in 17,333 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2621492
|
|
||||||
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bill For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 11:37am | #9 |
Explosive Salami
Stall Owner #1120.2520 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Not Ceasing & Desisting on the leeward side of Anger Island
Posts: 52,704
Thanks: 21,920
Thanked 28,170 Times in 11,910 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $9018209
|
|
03-04-2024, 11:38am | #10 | ||||||
10cm member
Barn Stall Owner #90125 NCM Supporter '19,'20
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston, Tejas, Estados Unidos
Posts: 82,399
Thanks: 37,443
Thanked 41,640 Times in 17,333 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2621492
|
|
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 11:45am | #11 | ||||||
A Real Barner
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Green Acres is the place to be...
Posts: 37,715
Thanks: 6,392
Thanked 23,677 Times in 10,731 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $8122190
|
|
||||||
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to LATB For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 11:46am | #12 | ||||||
10cm member
Barn Stall Owner #90125 NCM Supporter '19,'20
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston, Tejas, Estados Unidos
Posts: 82,399
Thanks: 37,443
Thanked 41,640 Times in 17,333 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2621492
|
|
||||||
03-04-2024, 12:27pm | #13 | ||||||
A Real Barner
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: America
Posts: 13,576
Thanks: 10,315
Thanked 6,378 Times in 2,184 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $1002182
|
I can only imagine how the libs and rinos are losing what’s left of their pea brains. It truly is a good day.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to gs568 For This Useful Post: |
03-04-2024, 12:29pm | #14 | ||||||
A Real Barner
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 1.Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean people aren't out to get me...
Posts: 1,643
Thanks: 681
Thanked 706 Times in 363 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $530
|
Well, there's always voter fraud, election interference & intimidation
|
||||||
03-04-2024, 12:34pm | #15 | ||||||
Barn Stall Owner #116
Doesn't have a big thing
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NOBROCOSOFLO
Posts: 14,246
Thanks: 3,605
Thanked 9,304 Times in 4,664 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $500
|
9-0 IS A BOOTSTOMPING!!
A sad day for those who hate OUR CONSTITUTION!! |
||||||
03-04-2024, 12:43pm | #16 | |||||||
Barn Stall Owner #55
Island14 Cardio Team
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory
Posts: 14,804
Thanks: 3,764
Thanked 9,227 Times in 4,390 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $23236
|
Quote:
What would push it over the edge? Trump losing the election would be one thing, as I still think there are enough Nevers to keep it close. Keeping him off the ballot would create chaos at the voting spots at a minimum. I have no inkling that the SC even slightly considered safety, as applying penalties without any convictions, or even realistic charges, would be not only moronic, but unconstitutional. |
|||||||
03-04-2024, 12:47pm | #17 | ||||||
A Real Barner
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Green Acres is the place to be...
Posts: 37,715
Thanks: 6,392
Thanked 23,677 Times in 10,731 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $8122190
|
|
||||||
03-04-2024, 12:50pm | #18 | |||||||
Barn Stall Owner #55
Island14 Cardio Team
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: A sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory
Posts: 14,804
Thanks: 3,764
Thanked 9,227 Times in 4,390 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $23236
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
03-04-2024, 12:52pm | #19 | ||||||
Vette Barn Crew
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 561
Thanks: 206
Thanked 251 Times in 139 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $501227
|
Saw that the left-leaning media are still claiming it as a victory - "Notice that SCOTUS didn't deny he's guilty of insurrection?" Idiots.
|
||||||
03-04-2024, 1:04pm | #20 | |||||||
Barn Stall Owner #116
Doesn't have a big thing
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NOBROCOSOFLO
Posts: 14,246
Thanks: 3,605
Thanked 9,304 Times in 4,664 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $500
|
Quote:
kagan and jackson: SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and JACKSON, JJ., concurring in judgment It simply creates a special rule for the insurrection disability in Section 3. The majority is left with next to no support for its requirement that a Section 3 disqualification can occur only pursuant to legislation enacted for that purpose. It cites Griffin’s Case, but that is a nonprecedential, lower court opinion by a single Justice in his capacity as a circuit judge. See ante, at 5 (quoting 11 F. Cas., at 26). Once again, even petitioner’s lawyer distanced himself from fully embracing this case as probative of Section 3’s meaning. See Tr. of Oral Arg. 35–36. The majority also cites Senator Trumbull’s statements that Section 3 “‘provide[d] no means for enforcing’” itself. Ante, at 5 (quoting Cong. Globe, 41st Cong., 1st Sess., 626 (1869)). The majority, however, neglects to mention the Senator’s view that “[i]t is the [F]ourteenth [A]mendment that prevents a person from holding office,” with the proposed legislation simply “affor[ding] a more efficient and speedy remedy” for effecting the disqualification. Cong. Globe, 41st Cong., 1st Sess., at 626–627. Ultimately, under the guise of providing a more “complete explanation for the judgment,” ante, at 13, the majority resolves many unsettled questions about Section 3. It forecloses judicial enforcement of that provision, such as might occur when a party is prosecuted by an insurrectionist and raises a defense on that score. The majority further holds that any legislation to enforce this provision must prescribe certain procedures “‘tailor[ed]’” to Section 3, ante, at 10, ruling out enforcement under general federal statutes requiring the government to comply with the law. By resolving these and other questions, the majority attempts to insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges to their holding federal office. * * * “What it does today, the Court should have left undone.” SOTOMAYOR, K AGAN, JACKSON, JJ., concurring in the judgment 6 TRUMP v. ANDERSON SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and JACKSON, JJ., concurring in judgment Bush v. Gore, 531 U. S. 98, 158 (2000) (Breyer, J., dissenting). The Court today needed to resolve only a single question: whether an individual State may keep a Presidential candidate found to have engaged in insurrection off its ballot. The majority resolves much more than the case before us. Although federal enforcement of Section 3 is in no way at issue, the majority announces novel rules for how that enforcement must operate. It reaches out to decide Section 3 questions not before us, and to foreclose future efforts to disqualify a Presidential candidate under that provision. In a sensitive case crying out for judicial restraint, it abandons that course. Section 3 serves an important, though rarely needed, role in our democracy. The American people have the power to vote for and elect candidates for national office, and that is a great and glorious thing. The men who drafted and ratified the Fourteenth Amendment, however, had witnessed an “insurrection [and] rebellion” to defend slavery. §3. They wanted to ensure that those who had participated in that insurrection, and in possible future insurrections, could not return to prominent roles. Today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how Section 3 can bar an oathbreaking insurrectionist from becoming President. Although we agree that Colorado cannot enforce Section 3, we protest the majority’s effort to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision. Because we would decide only the issue before us, we concur only in the judgment. |
|||||||
|
|
Support the Barn: |
Download the Mobile App; |
Follow us on Facebook: |
||