Zimmerman - you guys SUCK!!

[Jay13]

You guys suck. Since goddamn Red's thread and the nuclear fallout from my comments, I've actually tried to learn a little bit about this case. Sadly, I've learned little in the way of true facts, but I have been driven batshit by HLN. Thirty seconds after my blood pressure drops from watching Jane Valez Mitchell, this bitch Nancy Grace comes on.

Despite my efforts, I think I still know nothing about this case. I still have no opinion on whether the defendant is guilty or innocent because I can't watch every minute of the proceedings. But I have learned that these two bitches are nuts. My blood pressure has nothing to do with my belief as to guilt vs. innocence, it's solely related to the hack job going on with this particular network. This isn't reporting, it's a blynch mob.


Note: "Blynch Mob" is a phrase referring to a lynch mob made up of melodramatic bitches and is trademarked by Jay13 as of the date of this post.

[NEED-A-VETTE]

Yeah. Those two are pretty much assholes.

[Jay13]

Originally Posted by NEED-A-VETTE

Yeah. Those two are pretty much assholes.

I was thinking of an orifice generally located about 2.5" to the anterior.

[NeedSpeed]

I hadn't watched the trial. They only know what happened. Zimmer caused it, was told not to follow by 911, then was self defense because he got his ass beat.

So idk.

[NEED-A-VETTE]

Originally Posted by Jay13

I was thinking of an orifice generally located about 2.5" to the anterior.

That, too.

[RED-85-Z51]

HLN has good coverage during the trial...but you may as well be watching The Sharpton show after hours, its only slightly more biased than Jane and Nancy.

its funny how these highly liberal hosts and shows, can show the Rachel Jeanelle testimony and at any point in time find excerpts and call her "highly Credible" and "an innocent victim beinh harassed by the defense"

[Blue 92]

Originally Posted by RED-85-Z51

its funny how these highly liberal hosts and shows, can show the Rachel Jeanelle testimony and at any point in time find excerpts and call her "highly Credible" and "an innocent victim beinh harassed by the defense"

Ah yes. The lovely lady that claimed she could not read the letter written in cursive in spite of the fact she supposedly wrote the letter.....

[Knooger]

I haven't followed that at all either, just what I see posted on forums. Hell, I don't watch TV at all, except for DVD movies. I choose to piss away all my time on the Internet rather than on TV. News is all sensationalized bullshit not worth watching anyway.

[MEANZ06]

Originally Posted by Knooger

I haven't followed that at all either, just what I see posted on forums. Hell, I don't watch TV at all, except for DVD movies. I choose to piss away all my time on the Internet rather than on TV. News is all sensationalized bullshit not worth watching anyway.

[xXBUDXx]

Nancy Grace makes me want to stomp on kittens to shut her whore mouth.


Was that out loud?

[RED-85-Z51]

I wonder..if the defense had asked Rachel Jeantell ..."Ms Jeantell...tell me under oath here, was your testimony fueled or swayed at all by the fact the George Zimmerman had not been arrested..and Mr Martins Attorney had no evidence to take to the police to have him arrested"?

What her answer would have been. I think she would have blurted out "YES"....

[NavyC5]

Originally Posted by Blue 92

Ah yes. The lovely lady that claimed she could not read the letter written in cursive in spite of the fact she supposedly wrote the letter.....

Don't forget her multiple comments about smoking weed and drinking. Yeah, real credible witness

[69camfrk]

Originally Posted by Jay13

You guys suck. Since goddamn Red's thread and the nuclear fallout from my comments, I've actually tried to learn a little bit about this case. Sadly, I've learned little in the way of true facts, but I have been driven batshit by HLN. Thirty seconds after my blood pressure drops from watching Jane Valez Mitchell, this bitch Nancy Grace comes on.

Despite my efforts, I think I still know nothing about this case. I still have no opinion on whether the defendant is guilty or innocent because I can't watch every minute of the proceedings. But I have learned that these two bitches are nuts. My blood pressure has nothing to do with my belief as to guilt vs. innocence, it's solely related to the hack job going on with this particular network. This isn't reporting, it's a blynch mob.


Note: "Blynch Mob" is a phrase referring to a lynch mob made up of melodramatic bitches and is trademarked by Jay13 as of the date of this post.

You just now figured out that those are two of the angriest women on the planet. HLN isn't even news. It's crap. And yeah, I can't watch it anymore. Haven't for years.

[MikeB]

Originally Posted by RED-85-Z51

its funny how these highly liberal hosts and shows, can show the Rachel Jeanelle testimony and at any point in time find excerpts and call her "highly Credible" and "an innocent victim beinh harassed by the defense"

I always thought the Michelin Tire man was white?

[Stangkiller]

NBC is ready to hang Zimmerman now, and they're working as hard as they can do to do. It started with their edited 911 call tapes. I really home zimmermans gets a lot of money out of those assholes by time he's done.

[ConstantChange]

I've watched some of the case while at work and watched the neighbor who saw about 10 seconds of it before he went in to call 911.

If I'm on the jury, Zimmerman walks. If he's found guilty, I want to hear from the jury what testimony made them come to that conclusion, because I haven't heard it.

[CP]

Originally Posted by ConstantChange

I've watched some of the case while at work and watched the neighbor who saw about 10 seconds of it before he went in to call 911.

If I'm on the jury, Zimmerman walks. If he's found guilty, I want to hear from the jury what testimony made them come to that conclusion, because I haven't heard it.

You need to read up on the OJ trial.

[Cybercowboy]

Jay, Nancy Grace was on a few nights ago going off on George Zimmerman's gun. She had a "firearm expert" on who said that his Kel-Tec PF9 did not have an external safety. Earlier she had been saying "Why did he have a loaded gun in his waistband with the safety deactivated?" When he told her the gun did not have an external safety, she said (paraphrase) "Look, I don't know everything but you can't sit there and tell me that a Kel-Tec PF9 doesn't have a safety when I know perfectly well that it does. Get off my show, liar."

Of course, the Kel-Tec PF9 is like many small CCW class pistols, it does not have an external safety but instead relies on a very long trigger pull and has internal safeties to keep the gun from going off if dropped, etc.

She's a harpy. Fortunately now, it seems that it is becoming more expedient for the media to report the truth of this case rather than continue to propagate the lies of the prosecution and lawyers and media consultants of the boy's parents. Interestingly, a lady named Alicia Stanely recently made an appearance on Anderson Cooper 360. She was, in essence, Trayvon's "real mom" in that she actually tried to be a parent to him. She is exposing the wicked lies his mother and father have spun about Trayvon, and this will not end well for these lying evil people.

Jay, I knew about John Good's statement back in March of 2011. You can see why I would be stunned that they brought charges against Zimmerman. It appears only now that most other people are coming to that conclusion.

The absolute best website for information about this case is this one.

[Olustee bus]

Originally Posted by RED-85-Z51

HLN has good coverage during the trial...but you may as well be watching The Sharpton show after hours, its only slightly more biased than Jane and Nancy.

its funny how these highly liberal hosts and shows, can show the Rachel Jeanelle testimony and at any point in time find excerpts and call her "highly Credible" and "an innocent victim beinh harassed by the defense"

You are right on Red. Two instances;

1 the first day. There was much discussion about Zimmermans "mind set" because he told the dispatcher that Those punks are always up to no good" and "they always get away with it" or something to that effect. The prosecution was pointing out that because Zimmerman said that, his mindset was anger towards the black race and young black males.

On day two, Martins friend testified that he called Zimmerman a "creepy ass cracka". No word was mentioned of Martins "mindset". In my opinion, the defence should have pounced on Martins "mindset". The only thing that the cnn idiot's said was that because Zimmerman was following Martin, zimmerman must have been the aggressor.

2 Day Four. Eye witness account saw Martin on top of Zimmerman. It was pretty damn clear after that testimony that Martin was the agressor. The stupid cnn host only said that Zimmerman clearly had a vigilante attitude.

CNN really should be ashamed.

[Cybercowboy]

Originally Posted by Olustee bus

2 Day Four. Eye witness account saw Martin on top of Zimmerman. It was pretty damn clear after that testimony that Martin was the agressor. The stupid cnn host only said that Zimmerman clearly had a vigilante attitude.

CNN really should be ashamed.

Those same CNN hosts live in gate communities with people just like George Zimmerman keeping an eye out for suspicious characters. They have bodyguards, alarm systems, and lots of money to live in very nice areas. They are the worst kind of hypocrites, have propagated untold lies about Zimmerman and defamed his character to the point of parody, and should be carefully ignored and publicly shamed.