PLEASE don't vote Libertarian or Green Party...

[lspencer534]

The Fox News poll shows Libertarian Presidential candidate Gary Johnson with 3% of the vote and Green Party Presidential candidate Jill Stein with 2%, totaling 5%. I of course have no right to tell you how to vote, but I think that by voting for either of these two candidates means Hillary wins. This is going to be a close election. Fox News also has Clinton with 48% of the vote and Trump with 44%. If that 5% goes to Johnson or Stein, Hillary wins. But if it goes to Trump, he wins.

This year is just like 1992 when Ross Perot ran as an Independent against George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton. Perot received 19,743,821 votes, which resulted in Clinton being elected. [BTW, I know that MSM disputes this conclusion...but they lie.] Bush received only 37.5% of the vote to Clinton's 43%. See how that 5% becomes important?

As I said, I'm not going to tell you how to vote...but I'm asking you and imploring you to put our Country ahead of your convictions. I'll become an expatriate if Hillary is elected because my beloved County will be put up for auction to the highest bidder, and our Country will be in Islamic hands.

The attachment hasn't been verified, but it's chilling if true:

[snide]

There are a number of revelations in that email, if it is indeed true. This country is so fucked if that "walking cadaver" wins the election.

[Bill]

When I see pictures of Huma, with that signature deep red lipstick, the main thing that comes to mind is, "I bet she could give a great blow job."

[04 commemorative]

Originally Posted by bill_daniels

When I see pictures of Huma, with that signature deep red lipstick, the main thing that comes to mind is, "I bet she could give a great blow job."

yuk.....not with that lip stick please...

[snide]

Originally Posted by bill_daniels

When I see pictures of Huma, with that signature deep red lipstick, the main thing that comes to mind is, "I bet she could give a great blow job."

DO NOT WANT.

[Jeff '79]

What was your first clue?
Her name.
I had that feeling ever since hearing her name for the first time. And then seeing her and racially profiling her.
Alla akba !
Stock up citizens.

[Bill]

Originally Posted by snide

DO NOT WANT.

I think the danger of it would be exciting....you never know if you'll get blown up at the same time you are gettin' blown.

[Aerovette]

I don't buy that email for a second. I believe every detail in it, but I don't believe it exists.

[Admiral Blue]

You will not have to worry about a real race in a long, long time if killary wins.

[vetteman9368]

Originally Posted by Waco

This is a shortsighted and uninformed opinion, IMO.

With the most corrupt person to ever run for office? Not really

[Giraffe (He/Him)]

I'd like to lick the back of Huma's left kneecap.

[Olustee bus]

I agree, this election is way too important to try to make a statement with your vote.

[Admiral Blue]

Originally Posted by Waco

This is a shortsighted and uninformed opinion, IMO.

It's not an opinion. It's reality.

[Mike Mercury]

[Mike Mercury]

[RedLS1GTO]

Originally Posted by Waco

Having a third party in 2020 is what matters to me right now. Hillary is going to win anyway, and Trump is going to lose by far more than the difference.

How, exactly, do you think that voting for someone else TODAY is going to accomplish that? At best they will see low single digits and be yet another irrelevant footnote. If a 3rd party can't even be relevant with the shitshow candidates this year, you think that somehow miraculously it is going to happen 4 years from now?

If you don't want to vote for Trump or Hillary, great. I can't really blame you and that is certainly your choice, but acting as if that vote is actually accomplishing something is idealistic at best.

[Mike Mercury]

[RedLS1GTO]

Originally Posted by Waco

5% popular vote guarantees funding and placement on the ballot in every state in the next election. That's not nothing.

...and on the ballot or not, a 3rd party will be an irrelevant footnote 4 years from now, just as they are today.

Perot, who was by FAR the most legitimate non (D) or (R) in recent politics couldn't win a single state. Today, a 3rd party won't even get out of the single digits with these 2 idiots on the ticket. There is zero... ZERO... chance that the current 3rd party platforms will ever end up with someone in the White House. Z.E.R.O. Libertarians have a decent stance on some issues but on others are not even in the zip code of reality. There is WAY too much idealistic nonsense built in. It's simply not going to happen.

There is a much better chance of changing (fixing) 1 of the current 2 parties than establishing something from the ground up. I personally don't see any chance that the (D) side would align with my views which means that the only realistic chance for 4 years from now depends on how the current divide in the (R) side plays out.

[Mike Mercury]

Originally Posted by RedLS1GTO

There is a much better chance of changing (fixing) 1 of the current 2 parties than establishing something from the ground up. I personally don't see any chance that the (D) side would align with my views which means that the only realistic chance for 4 years from now depends on how the current divide in the (R) side plays out.

point.

[OddBall]

Well OK, but Alfred E. Neuman is going to be pissed that I won't be writing him in.