Choose your color scheme:
The Vette Barn  
 
Go Back   The Vette Barn > Off Topic/Babes/Other > Off Topic

Off Topic Off Topic - General non-Corvette related discussion.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2020, 10:04pm   #1
bill_daniels
Barn Stall Owner #90125
NCM Supporter '19
Points: 102,412, Level: 100
Activity: 66.8%
 
bill_daniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston, Tejas, Estados Unidos
Posts: 40,527
Thanks: 11,753
Thanked 15,281 Times in 7,785 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2609963
Default AR-15 Loophole Coming Soon?

https://apnews.com/396bbedbf4963a28b...ung-browser-us


Quote:
DALLAS (AP) — A subtle design feature of the AR-15 rifle has raised a technical legal question that is derailing cases against people who are charged with illegally buying and selling the gun’s parts or building the weapon.

At issue is whether a key piece of one of America’s most popular firearms meets the definition of a gun that prosecutors have long relied on.

For decades, the federal government has treated a mechanism called the lower receiver as the essential piece of the semiautomatic rifle, which has been used in some of the nation’s deadliest mass shootings. Prosecutors regularly bring charges based on that specific part.

But some defense attorneys have recently argued that the part alone does not meet the definition in the law. Federal law enforcement officials, who have long been concerned about the discrepancy, are increasingly worried that it could hinder some criminal prosecutions and undermine firearms regulations nationwide.

“Now the cat is out of the bag, so I think you’ll see more of this going on,” said Stephen Halbrook, an attorney who has written books on gun law and history. “Basically, the government has gotten away with this for a long time.”

Cases involving lower receivers represent a small fraction of the thousands of federal gun charges filed each year. But the loophole has allowed some people accused of illegally selling or possessing the parts, including convicted felons, to escape prosecution. The issue also complicates efforts to address so-called ghost guns, which are largely untraceable because they are assembled from parts.

Since 2016, at least five defendants have challenged the government and succeeded in getting some charges dropped, avoiding prison or seeing their cases dismissed entirely. Three judges have rejected the government’s interpretation of the law, despite dire warnings from prosecutors.

Federal regulations define a firearm’s “frame” or “receiver” as the piece considered to be the gun itself. But in an AR-15, the receiver is split into upper and lower parts — and some of the components listed in the definition are contained in the upper half. That has led judges to rule that a lower receiver alone cannot be considered a gun.

The lower receiver sits above the pistol grip, holds the trigger and hammer, and has a slot for the magazine. By itself, it cannot fire a bullet. But by treating the piece as a firearm, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is able to regulate who can obtain it. Because authorities consider the part to be a gun, people prohibited from having firearms have been charged for possessing them.

In 2018, prosecutors said a ruling against the government would “seriously undermine the ATF’s ability to trace and regulate firearms nationwide.” CNN first reported the case and its implications.

Last month, a federal judge in Ohio dealt the latest blow, dismissing charges against two men accused of making false statements to buy lower receivers.

“Any public citizen would be concerned about this loophole that we exploited,” said attorney Thomas Kurt, who represented defendant Richard Rowold. “As a citizen, I hope the ATF corrects this. As Mr. Rowold’s attorney, I’m grateful the judge followed the law in getting to the correct result.”

The gun industry estimates there are more than 17 million AR-15-style rifles in circulation, and the National Rifle Association once dubbed it “America’s rifle.” AR-15-style weapons were used in attacks in Newtown, Connecticut, Las Vegas and Parkland, Florida.

In the case of Rowold, who is prohibited from buying or possessing firearms because of felony convictions, the government claimed that he used another man as a proxy to purchase 50 lower receivers. The 2018 indictment also charged him with having 15 lower receivers. Kurt declined to comment on why his client had the parts.

The case rested on the ATF’s claim that the components were legally firearms. Judge James Carr called that a “plainly erroneous” reading of the law and said the agency has a duty to fix the problem.

“Misapplying the law for a long time provides no immunity from scrutiny,” Carr wrote in his order to dismiss.

Federal prosecutors in Rowold’s case and several others declined to comment. An ATF spokeswoman would not answer questions posed by The Associated Press but said the agency is “keenly assessing” Carr’s decision.

The problem has attracted attention at the highest levels of law enforcement.

In 2016, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch wrote a letter to House Speaker Paul Ryan after a judge dismissed a case in Northern California involving a man with a felony record who was accused of buying an unmarked AR-15 lower receiver from an undercover agent.

Prosecutors argued that the case against Alejandro Jimenez should proceed even if the part “does not perfectly fit” the legal definition. The judge dismissed the charges.

The decision prompted Lynch to write that if the ATF wants an AR-15 lower receiver to be considered a firearm under the law, then it should pursue “regulatory or administrative action.” But there’s no public record of the ATF taking such a step.

“I can’t imagine why no one has taken the initiative to correct this,” said Dan O’Kelly, a former senior ATF agent and director of a gun-training company known as International Firearm Specialist Academy. His testimony has guided several defense attorneys.

Since Lynch’s letter, such prosecutions have continued to secure prison sentences.

In April, for instance, an Oklahoma man was charged with illegally possessing a firearm after police who pulled him over found loaded high-capacity magazines and the lower receiver of an AR-15-style rifle in his truck.

Jason Scott Pedro, a 37-year-old with a felony record for domestic violence, was sentenced in November to seven years in prison.

There’s no evidence in court records that Pedro’s lawyer challenged whether the lower receiver was rightly considered a gun. The attorney did not respond to requests for comment but has filed a notice of appeal.

“I think the criminal defense bar has kind of let their clients down for letting this go on for all these years,” Halbrook said.

In one case, an ATF expert testified that the same principle could apply to many other firearms. Prosecutors worry that more rulings against the government could allow people prohibited from having guns to purchase weapons piece by piece with no regulation or background check.

Franklin Zimring, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, is skeptical of that claim and said the same behavior could often be prosecuted under state laws.

The AR-15 is a popular model for gun enthusiasts to legally build at home. The rifles are sometimes constructed out of partially machined receivers, often called “80% receivers,” which can be bought and sold without background checks and need not have serial numbers because they are unfinished.

If federal officials want to maintain control in this growing do-it-yourself gun market they need to first establish functional regulation of lower receivers, said Kristen Rand, legislative director at the Washington, D.C.-based Violence Policy Center.

“From a public safety standpoint,” she said, ”this is very important and isn’t just an in-the-weeds legal definitional problem.”

___

Dazio reported from Los Angeles. Associated Press Writer Lisa Marie Pane in Boise, Idaho, and researcher Jennifer Farrar in New York City contributed to this report.
bill_daniels is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2020, 10:13pm   #2
FX VETTE
Vette Barn Crew
Points: 5,277, Level: 49
Activity: 61.5%
 
FX VETTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: The Steel City, Colorful Colorado
Posts: 698
Thanks: 177
Thanked 238 Times in 112 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $1084111
Default

Good Lawd Dats Allotta Werds
FX VETTE is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FX VETTE For This Useful Post:
Old 01-13-2020, 10:15pm   #3
bill_daniels
Barn Stall Owner #90125
NCM Supporter '19
Points: 102,412, Level: 100
Activity: 66.8%
 
bill_daniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston, Tejas, Estados Unidos
Posts: 40,527
Thanks: 11,753
Thanked 15,281 Times in 7,785 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2609963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FX VETTE View Post
Good Lawd Dats Allotta Werds
Tl;DR: Since the ATF's definition of a firearm includes features in both the upper and lower receiver of an AR, then just the lower by itself doesn't actually meet the definition of a firearm, and shouldn't require a background check.


Edit: Everyone who bought a lower receiver and had to pay for a background check got screwed by Uncle Sam and deserves a refund.
bill_daniels is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to bill_daniels For This Useful Post:
Old 01-13-2020, 10:16pm   #4
FX VETTE
Vette Barn Crew
Points: 5,277, Level: 49
Activity: 61.5%
 
FX VETTE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: The Steel City, Colorful Colorado
Posts: 698
Thanks: 177
Thanked 238 Times in 112 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $1084111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill_daniels View Post
Tl;DR: Since the ATF's definition of a firearm includes features in both the upper and lower receiver of an AR, then just the lower by itself doesn't actually meet the definition of a firearm, and shouldn't require a background check.
Thanks for the cliffs
FX VETTE is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FX VETTE For This Useful Post:
Old 01-13-2020, 10:30pm   #5
sublime1996525
A Real Barner
Points: 2,568, Level: 32
Activity: 61.5%
 
sublime1996525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 3,370
Thanks: 2,524
Thanked 837 Times in 437 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $1004772
Default

Man it’s good to live in Utah.
sublime1996525 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2020, 9:26am   #6
Mike Mercury
Chief Meat Gazer
Charter Member
Barn Stall Owner #98
Barn Raising II,III,IV
Points: 97,308, Level: 100
Activity: 46.9%
 
Mike Mercury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 32,898
Thanks: 11,126
Thanked 19,931 Times in 7,902 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $5125673
Default

Mike Mercury is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mike Mercury For This Useful Post:
Old 01-14-2020, 2:43pm   #7
Lipstic
Barn Stall Owner #0380
Points: 11,627, Level: 74
Activity: 13.3%
 
Lipstic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,989
Thanks: 2,123
Thanked 1,463 Times in 468 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2004865
Default

Name:  IMG_3147.JPG
Views: 57
Size:  293.4 KB
Lipstic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Lipstic For This Useful Post:
Old 01-14-2020, 3:35pm   #8
Cybercowboy
2016 Election Expert
Barn Stall Owner #64
Points: 46,684, Level: 100
Activity: 10.6%
 
Cybercowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 17,290
Thanks: 911
Thanked 8,298 Times in 4,048 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $11375790
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sublime1996525 View Post
Man it’s good to live in Utah.
Your senators are Mitt Romney and Mike Lee ffs.
Cybercowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2020, 5:29pm   #9
bill_daniels
Barn Stall Owner #90125
NCM Supporter '19
Points: 102,412, Level: 100
Activity: 66.8%
 
bill_daniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston, Tejas, Estados Unidos
Posts: 40,527
Thanks: 11,753
Thanked 15,281 Times in 7,785 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2609963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cybercowboy View Post
Your senators are Mitt Romney and Mike Lee ffs.
The really tragic part about that is, Trump ENDORSED Romney, and Romney STILL won't play ball. He's still as big a Trump hater as he can be. I don't understand why Trump endorsed him. Had Trump campaigned for another candidate and Romney still won, Romney would still be looking to screw Trump just the same as he is now.

You know Romney is one of the votes keeping Cocaine Mitch from just having a simple up or down vote on the impeachment nonsense. The three sisters, Romney, Murkowsky and Collins would be a block no vote, and I bet Sasse and a few others were ready with no votes just in case Collins had an attack of common sense.

And I hate to say I told you so, but I seem to remember being berated for not holding my nose to vote for Romney, McCain and Bush, and now that we finally have a Trump, we all have a baseline as to just how shitty those 3 actually are/were. When it was THEIR turn to be asked to hold their noses, they famously didn't vote Trump, their own party's candidate.





Edit: Just saw on the news a very smug Romney saying he wants to hear from.....John Bolton. He doesn't want to hear from the whistleblower, from Adam Schiff, from Joe and Hunter.....none of that, just Bolton, who may have something embarrassing to say about Trump. Friggen' douchebag.
bill_daniels is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 2:33pm   #10
DJ_Critterus
Stall Owner #1120.2520
Points: 59,092, Level: 100
Activity: 92.0%
 
DJ_Critterus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: I enjoy long romantic walks to the fridge.
Posts: 25,750
Thanks: 9,082
Thanked 5,033 Times in 2,839 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $9014984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill_daniels View Post
The really tragic part about that is, Trump ENDORSED Romney, and Romney STILL won't play ball. He's still as big a Trump hater as he can be. I don't understand why Trump endorsed him. Had Trump campaigned for another candidate and Romney still won, Romney would still be looking to screw Trump just the same as he is now.

You know Romney is one of the votes keeping Cocaine Mitch from just having a simple up or down vote on the impeachment nonsense. The three sisters, Romney, Murkowsky and Collins would be a block no vote, and I bet Sasse and a few others were ready with no votes just in case Collins had an attack of common sense.

And I hate to say I told you so, but I seem to remember being berated for not holding my nose to vote for Romney, McCain and Bush, and now that we finally have a Trump, we all have a baseline as to just how shitty those 3 actually are/were. When it was THEIR turn to be asked to hold their noses, they famously didn't vote Trump, their own party's candidate.





Edit: Just saw on the news a very smug Romney saying he wants to hear from.....John Bolton. He doesn't want to hear from the whistleblower, from Adam Schiff, from Joe and Hunter.....none of that, just Bolton, who may have something embarrassing to say about Trump. Friggen' douchebag.
I wonder why Bolton is now saying that he wants to testify?
DJ_Critterus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 2:54pm   #11
DAB
Sparkles Flambeaux
Barn Stall Owner #4
Barn Raising I,II
NCM Supporter '13,'14,'15,'16,'17
Bantayan Kids '13,'14,'15,'17
Points: 132,736, Level: 100
Activity: 22.3%
 
DAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 55,801
Thanks: 10,086
Thanked 20,567 Times in 10,825 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $32000307
Default

pretty good bet Trump knows what Bolton will say. pretty good bet no one else knows what Bolton will say.

Lawyering 101: do not ask a question of a witness when you don't know what they will say.
DAB is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DAB For This Useful Post:
Old 01-15-2020, 4:08pm   #12
Dixievet
Administrator
Barn Stall Owner #14
Barn Raising II,III Chef

NCM Supporter '11,'12,'13,'14,'15,'16,'17
Bantayan Kids '13,'14,'15,'17
Points: 57,082, Level: 100
Activity: 20.4%
 
Dixievet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: between here and there
Posts: 21,511
Thanks: 7,594
Thanked 10,385 Times in 4,229 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $27599395
Default

Name:  IMG_4355.JPG
Views: 25
Size:  170.5 KB

And now for Virginia’s take on the situation
__________________
Dixievet is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dixievet For This Useful Post:
Old 01-15-2020, 6:08pm   #13
bill_daniels
Barn Stall Owner #90125
NCM Supporter '19
Points: 102,412, Level: 100
Activity: 66.8%
 
bill_daniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston, Tejas, Estados Unidos
Posts: 40,527
Thanks: 11,753
Thanked 15,281 Times in 7,785 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $2609963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dixievet View Post
Attachment 37073

And now for Virginia’s take on the situation

I wonder why he didn't ban Dodge Chargers? That would have been more appropriate.
bill_daniels is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bill_daniels For This Useful Post:
Reply

The Vette Barn > Off Topic/Babes/Other > Off Topic


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:31am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 - 2019 The Vette Barn


Support the Barn:
 
Download the Mobile App;
 
Follow us on Facebook:

Become a Stall Owner

 

Apple iOS App        Google Android App

 

Visit our Facebook page