Looks Like ALL Human Beings Will Be Treated Equally

[z06psi]

Originally Posted by JetMechZ16

Telling someone to STFU does not make them STFU!

Perxactly. However, I have told Jeff79 to STFU and he actually did.

[z06psi]

YouTube

[Mick]

Originally Posted by Steve_R

Good point, but I did say "lower than..." Being a middle aged, heterosexual, white male means you're inherently evil in the brave new world we're living in.

The only thing worse than a 50+ year old heterosexual white male is:

A 50+ year old heterosexual white male that worked for decades, and had the audacity to save for retirement so that he is not dependent on the government.

I have the feeling you are the lowest of the low.

Originally Posted by Steve_R

Good thing I'll never have apply for a job again, I'd have to wear blackface.

The last year or two before I gave up on getting back into Corporate America, I swore that if I ever got close to another Corporate job, I was going to claim I was gay. I was pretty serious about it. I mean, what were they going to do? Demand to watch me suck a dick?

[Anjdog2003]

Originally Posted by Mick

I was going to claim I was gay. I was pretty serious about it. I mean, what were they going to do? Demand to watch me suck a dick?

They wouldn't have to demand you. They could ask anyone here and we'd say you were

[JetMechZ16]

Originally Posted by Anjdog2003

They wouldn't have to demand you. They could ask anyone here and we'd say you were

Every once in a while you show a deep and sincere wisdom I never expected out of you. It almost makes me want to forgive you for being Californian, but not quite.

[04 commemorative]

Originally Posted by DAB

what if you are white?

You're screwed

[Olustee bus]

Apparently that ruling is going to have a helluva impact on society for the future. It may just be the beginning of a transformation of our society.

https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2020...igious-groups/

[Jeff '79]

Originally Posted by Olustee bus

Apparently that ruling is going to have a helluva impact on society for the future. It may just be the beginning of a transformation of our society.

https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2020...igious-groups/

So your view is that discrimination is ok ?

“You’re going to see these decisions going overwhelmingly in favor of the litigants [and] the plaintiffs who are challenging any religious organization, or any school, or anyone who wants to maintain a traditional, biologically based, scientific-based understanding of sex,” Severino forecasted."

The above is basically the cliffs and , imo, seem to say that it's ok for an organization to discriminate.

Discrimination is not ok, ergo, the decicision.

Freeing slaves transformed our society. Is the break from the status quo really that bad ?

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by Jeff '79

So your view is that discrimination is ok ?

Stupid rhetorical question.

[Jeff '79]

Originally Posted by Strats-N-Vettes

Stupid rhetorical question.

Stupid useless post

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by Jeff '79

Stupid useless post

Yours was stupider.

STFU Snide
stupider is a legit comparative adjective
*rolls eyes*

[Steve_R]

Originally Posted by Jeff '79

So your view is that discrimination is ok ?

“You’re going to see these decisions going overwhelmingly in favor of the litigants [and] the plaintiffs who are challenging any religious organization, or any school, or anyone who wants to maintain a traditional, biologically based, scientific-based understanding of sex,” Severino forecasted."

The above is basically the cliffs and , imo, seem to say that it's ok for an organization to discriminate.

Discrimination is not ok, ergo, the decicision.

Freeing slaves transformed our society. Is the break from the status quo really that bad ?

If a church won't accept gay members and gets sued, which freedom takes precedence; religious freedom or gay freedom? Why?

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by Steve_R

If a church won't accept gay members and gets sued, which freedom takes precedence; religious freedom or gay freedom? Why?

Gay freedom.


Why?
Because religious freedom is typically associated with white, conservative Christians.
Society can no longer have the majority rule, society has to cater to, and propel every minority human or ideology to the top of the pedestal.

[Jeff '79]

Originally Posted by Steve_R

If a church won't accept gay members and gets sued, which freedom takes precedence; religious freedom or gay freedom? Why?

People have the right to practice any religion they want, but can't discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, race, gender, etc.
Kinda like saying whites can drive 85mph, but blacks can only drive 55mph.
That's basic discrimination.

[Jeff '79]

Originally Posted by Strats-N-Vettes

Gay freedom.


Why?
Because religious freedom is typically associated with white, conservative Christians.
Society can no longer have the majority rule, society has to cater to, and propel every minority human or ideology to the top of the pedestal.

To the top of the pedestal? Yes, maybe until they get their due equal rights.
After that, they'll fade away and resume their normal lives.
Wow. paranoid or what ?

[Steve_R]

Originally Posted by Jeff '79

People have the right to practice any religion they want, but can't discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, race, gender, etc.
Kinda like saying whites can drive 85mph, but blacks can only drive 55mph.
That's basic discrimination.

So gay freedom trumps religious freedom even though one is specifically guaranteed by the Constitution and one isn't. Gotcha.

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by Jeff '79

People have the right to practice any religion they want, but can't discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, race, gender, etc.

Kinda like saying whites can drive 85mph, but blacks can only drive 55mph.
That's basic discrimination.

You mean like:

"you cant have the job because the under-qualified LGBTQ/black/brown/feminazi gets it, even though you're the most qualified. "

You mean like that?...that kind of discrimination?

[Steve_R]

Originally Posted by Strats-N-Vettes

You mean like:

"you cant have the job because the under-qualified LGBTQ/black/brown/feminazi gets it, even though you're the most qualified. "

You mean like that?...that kind of discrimination?

Reverse discrimination doesn't exist. And even if it did, it's okay.

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by Jeff '79

To the top of the pedestal? Yes, maybe until they get their due equal rights.
After that, they'll fade away and resume their normal lives.
Wow. paranoid or what ?

And there ya have it.
Minorities rule.

What's wrong with them earning it?

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by Steve_R

Reverse discrimination doesn't exist. And even if it did, it's okay.

Didn't Cali. have something Like proposition 501?
Because I want the quota/discrimination suit heart surgeon working on my family instead of the one that finished at the top of their class.