OJ Dead at 76

[Bill]

[Aerovette]

Is it possible that AC did it? marginally. Is it possible OJ took a bullet for him? Hell no. No way, no how. OJ did not go through all that trial BS for his buddy...that would have recently KILLED someone OJ cared for.

[owc6]

I always thought he did it.

However it's out of our hands, now. God will sort it out.

[IB4TL]

Originally Posted by bill_daniels

Too bad he wasn't shot in the early '90s

[Trapper Sean]

For youse all who are intellectual babes in the woods, not to mention ne'erdwells banned from that other site, you'll be glad to know that CD set the record straight with his own final post and then locked the thread.

[RMVette]

Originally Posted by Trapper Sean

For youse all who are intellectual babes in the woods, not to mention ne'erdwells banned from that other site, you'll be glad to know that CD set the record straight with his own final post and then locked the thread.

[04 commemorative]

Originally Posted by Trapper Sean

For youse all who are intellectual babes in the woods, not to mention ne'erdwells banned from that other site, you'll be glad to know that CD set the record straight with his own final post and then locked the thread.

Well.....screen shot it so us banned folk can see it

[vettemed]

Originally Posted by 04 commemorative

Well.....screen shot it so us banned folk can see it

Probably went something like "He was found innocent and you crackers are all racist for suggesting otherwise, so the thread is locked, and you can all kiss my black ass"

[Mick]

Originally Posted by Aerovette

Is it possible that AC did it? marginally. Is it possible OJ took a bullet for him? Hell no. No way, no how. OJ did not go through all that trial BS for his buddy...that would have recently KILLED someone OJ cared for.

DNA evidence presented at OJ's trial showed that there was a ONE IN A BILLION chance that someone other than OJ committed the murders. The jury felt that one in a billion chance was not sufficient to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that OJ did it. You can come to your own conclusion if you want.

Originally Posted by vettemed

Probably went something like "He was found innocent and you crackers are all racist for suggesting otherwise, so the thread is locked, and you can all kiss my black ass"

OJ was most definitely NOT "proven innocent". He was "found not guilty". There is a huge difference between the two.

And yes, as soon as I saw that thread, I thought "how long until Cumdawg locks this one?"

[LATB]

OJ was found not guilty because the judge presiding over the trial lost control of his courtroom. He willingly turned over control to the attorneys and the TV cameras.

[KenHorse]

Originally Posted by LATB

OJ was found not guilty because the judge presiding over the trial lost control of his courtroom. He willingly turned over control to the attorneys and the TV cameras.

Judge Ito

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQezL9pLUN4

[GTOguy]

Originally Posted by Mick

DNA evidence presented at OJ's trial showed that there was a ONE IN A BILLION chance that someone other than OJ committed the murders. The jury felt that one in a billion chance was not sufficient to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that OJ did it. You can come to your own conclusion if you want.



OJ was most definitely NOT "proven innocent". He was "found not guilty". There is a huge difference between the two.

And yes, as soon as I saw that thread, I thought "how long until Cumdawg locks this one?"

I disagree. It has come out that approximately 90% of the jury wanted payback for what they perceived a injustice in the Rodney King trial just prior. They had been shown only the beating portion of the tape (not the attack King instigated on the cops) and assumed it was racism. (Like they assume everything else is). Black celebrity kills two white people? HELL YES. That's the real reason, nothing as logical as bad evidence.

[Mick]

Originally Posted by GTOguy

I disagree. It has come out that approximately 90% of the jury wanted payback for what they perceived a injustice in the Rodney King trial just prior. They had been shown only the beating portion of the tape (not the attack King instigated on the cops) and assumed it was racism. (Like they assume everything else is). Black celebrity kills two white people? HELL YES. That's the real reason, nothing as logical as bad evidence.

Part of the same problem. Several jurors admitted that they never seriously considered that OJ was guilty, so saying there was a one in a billion chance it wasn't him was good enough for them. Basically, that trial was won at jury selection, as many are.

[PLRX]

Originally Posted by LATB

OJ was found not guilty because the judge presiding over the trial lost control of his courtroom. He willingly turned over control to the attorneys and the TV cameras.

That guy was the weakest link of all. He showed NO balls, backbone, or presence during that trial.

[Wathen1955]

YouTube (Short URL)

[VatorMan]

OJ isn’t the first murderer to get off by hiring high paid lawyers. But lawyers can’t erase his association with the murders.

AKA Teddy (drunk) Kennedy.

[dvarapala]

Originally Posted by GTOguy

I disagree. It has come out that approximately 90% of the jury wanted payback for what they perceived a injustice in the Rodney King trial just prior. Black celebrity kills two white people? HELL YES. That's the real reason, nothing as logical as bad evidence.

[Anjdog2003]

Judge Ito was a joke. He got caught up on all the media hype and made an ass out of himself.

[JRD77VET]

Originally Posted by Aerovette

Is it possible that AC did it? marginally. Is it possible OJ took a bullet for him? Hell no. No way, no how. OJ did not go through all that trial BS for his buddy...that would have recently KILLED someone OJ cared for.

Did OJ take the ultimate hit and protect his son? His son was known to have major anger issues.

Why did OJ get his son a lawyer on standby when they were looking at OJ?

There was DNA evidence that was NOT OJ's . His son's DNA was never collected by the police.

Lots of questions/ theories and one of the big pieces of the puzzle just died.

[LATB]

Originally Posted by PLRX

That guy was the weakest link of all. He showed NO balls, backbone, or presence during that trial.

Originally Posted by Anjdog2003

Judge Ito was a joke. He got caught up on all the media hype and made an ass out of himself.

Ito is a lib-idiot and as typical with lefties they screw up everything that they are involved with.