[MERGED] Post-Sandy-Hook Gun-Chat Thread [MERGED]

[Blademaker]

Fuck them

It won't be the first time I've been called a criminal.


Furthermore, it's not gonna happen anyway.

"Hello Sir, I'm from the government, and I'm here to take possession of your guns."

Yeah............riiiiiiiiight............Ruby Ridge/Waco will pale in comparison to the sudden gunfights that break out across the nation.

[vtelvr]

I have no guns....Not sure what you're talking about Willis.

[GentleBen]

Originally Posted by FasterTraffic

I'm still waiting for the bans on baseball bats, samurai swords, Cadillacs, and Ryder trucks.

And whiskey/whisky, rum, vodka, saki, wine, beer, all other intoxicants, all hallucingens, and anything else that would confuse the "sheeple".

[Cybercowboy]

Hmmm, this is why the 2nd amendment is so crucial.

[bierbelly]

Originally Posted by Thomas

"Gun Nut?" That'll help drive a reasonable discussion forward.

You mean like "Liberal F**ktard" does?

[lander]

Originally Posted by bierbelly

You mean like "Liberal F**ktard" does?

Done with you.

[Giraffe (He/Him)]

Originally Posted by bierbelly

You mean like "Liberal F**ktard" does?

I have the same opinion of that:

[Joecooool]

Originally Posted by DAB

and just what kind of due process would be involved? some 'expert' hired by the state that says you don't get a gun? pass. that's just a govt funded kangaroo court.

some test? if i pass, will you leave me alone, or will you claim the test was flawed, or make me retake it over and over?

some detailed interview? see first item.

how about other rights? free speech? perhaps you should have to submit your thoughts and ideas for approval before you say them or write them? pass.

And here is the problem we face. I have proposed a rational suggestion and it is immediately shot down. Its this kind of brick wall that will be your sides undoing. Say what you will, your inability to even begin to discuss rational solutions will result in restrictions far worse than you would otherwise see. One or two more of these kind of shootings and that's going to be it...

[Joecooool]

Originally Posted by lander

Over 100 posts, and still not a hint at a common ground proposal from the left on how this tragedy could have been averted.

That's because your side has no common ground to reach.

[6spdC6]

Originally Posted by Joecooool

That's because your side has no common ground to reach.

You of all people to say something like that!

[Yerf Dog]

As long as I can keep my small arms...

[lander]

Originally Posted by 6spdC6

You of all people to say something like that!

It's just proof that they don't want to compromise. The lefts view of compromise is to agree with them.

Unfortunately I was truly after a decent discussion on this topic, but unfortunately there are no thinking liberals on this forum. If they can't spew the orders they receive each day, they are truly void of any sound argument.


Oh well, I tried.

[kingpin]

:train:

[dwjz06]

Keep em If I had any they knew about anyway

[Giraffe (He/Him)]

Originally Posted by kingpin

:deadhorse:

[Giraffe (He/Him)]

[Giraffe (He/Him)]

[RED-85-Z51]

Buy a few 55 gallon drums or poly barrels, bury them in the back yard, dump in a few pounds of rice to keep moisture down as long as possible, put in guns/ammo, backfill and hope for the best.

A friends uncle has, last I heard, about 40 drums buried on his property, some filled with just ammo, some filled with rifles, some with pistols, some with shotguns, some with...and Im not kidding, grenades..and shit like that. Im told he used to own an army surplus store and got most of his stuff from customers over the years.

[Rob]

I have a Red Rider bb gun...WTF are they going to do with that?

[lander]

Just reading Drudge...the left wing loons are already out there...in the form of "journalist". They want these guns off the streets and out of legal owners hands because there is no need for these weapons to go hunting.

Another left wing nut that has no idea nor care for what the Constitution says and means.

Liberals always say they don’t want to take away guns. But give them an awful tragedy like the Newtown, Conn. shooting and they get bolder and more honest. MSNBC host Ed Schultz showed a rare bout of such honesty during a brief Twitter exchange Saturday. Schultz asked “Why should anyone own an assault rifle ?” and followed it up by saying “it's the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact.”

Read more: MSNBC?s Ed Schultz Talks Gun ?Confiscation? | NewsBusters.org]

These are "unbiased journalists" saying these things...imagine what a biased liberal really feels.

Now, about that red herring of a slippery slope that some LFT mentioned?