We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union

[ChasC5]

House Republicans, who orchestrated the symbolic exercise as an early gesture to the tea party movement, touted it as a way to bring the new Congress, and the people they represent, back to America's roots.

But they didn't want to go all the way back.

They skipped several passages that no longer apply, including those that condoned slavery, angering some Democrats. On a day designed to celebrate the Founding Fathers' growing role in the nation's political discourse, Democrats accused Republicans of distorting history and the men who wrote it.

'To form a more perfect Union,' but reading sparks some division


Nice try ... your true colors are starting to show ... yet again.

[Peter Pan]

Rematch: Rep. Weiner Squares Off Against Hannity, Rep. Bachmann | The Blaze

Weiner is such a loser, like the POTUShttp://www.theblaze.com/stories/rematch-rep-weiner-squares-off-against-hannity-rep-bachmann/

Government
Rematch: Rep. Weiner Squares Off Against Hannity, Rep. Bachmann
Posted on January 7, 2011 at 9:48am by Jonathon M. Seidl Print » Email » Sean Hannity had an idea on Thursday night: Since Reps. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and Anthony Weiner (D-NY) fought on TV on Sunday (or rather, Weiner mocked Bachmann on Sunday), let’s bring them back together in a “face off” to see what happens.

But instead of a repeat of Bachmann vs. Weiner, Hannity’s segment turned into Weiner vs. Hannity.

Weiner was his normal sarcastic, cocky self. But instead of going after Bachmann, he set his sights mainly on Hannity. At one point he crossed his arms and declared he was a “much better interview” than talking about Barack Obama, and then repeatedly took shots at Hannity’s interview techniques. He even called Hannity “buddy” during a lecture on follow-up questions. Hannity responded by jabbing back: “Poor Anthony Weiner, he’s having such a tough time here.”

Not to disappoint, Weiner did eventually turn his sarcasm and sly grin on Bachmann, especially when it came to talking about the Congressional Budget Office numbers:



In the end, Hannity’s idea paid dividends by creating exciting TV.

[Exotix]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

House Republicans, who orchestrated the symbolic exercise as an early gesture to the tea party movement, touted it as a way to bring the new Congress, and the people they represent, back to America's roots.

But they didn't want to go all the way back.

They skipped several passages that no longer apply, including those that condoned slavery, angering some Democrats. On a day designed to celebrate the Founding Fathers' growing role in the nation's political discourse, Democrats accused Republicans of distorting history and the men who wrote it.

'To form a more perfect Union,' but reading sparks some division


Nice try ... your true colors are starting to show ... yet again.

By the end of the entire debacle ,,, the house members were either asleep or just plain left ... like Bohner ...

This was just the first day of the *new* (R) house...

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by Peter Pan

Rematch: Rep. Weiner Squares Off Against Hannity, Rep. Bachmann | The Blaze

Weiner is such a loser, like the POTUShttp://www.theblaze.com/stories/rematch-rep-weiner-squares-off-against-hannity-rep-bachmann/

Government
Rematch: Rep. Weiner Squares Off Against Hannity, Rep. Bachmann
Posted on January 7, 2011 at 9:48am by Jonathon M. Seidl Print » Email » Sean Hannity had an idea on Thursday night: Since Reps. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) and Anthony Weiner (D-NY) fought on TV on Sunday (or rather, Weiner mocked Bachmann on Sunday), let’s bring them back together in a “face off” to see what happens.

But instead of a repeat of Bachmann vs. Weiner, Hannity’s segment turned into Weiner vs. Hannity.

Weiner was his normal sarcastic, cocky self. But instead of going after Bachmann, he set his sights mainly on Hannity. At one point he crossed his arms and declared he was a “much better interview” than talking about Barack Obama, and then repeatedly took shots at Hannity’s interview techniques. He even called Hannity “buddy” during a lecture on follow-up questions. Hannity responded by jabbing back: “Poor Anthony Weiner, he’s having such a tough time here.”

Not to disappoint, Weiner did eventually turn his sarcasm and sly grin on Bachmann, especially when it came to talking about the Congressional Budget Office numbers:



In the end, Hannity’s idea paid dividends by creating exciting TV.

Are you posting a response to a the wrong thread?