Welcome!!!

[Little Red L98.]

Originally Posted by The_Dude

your post is gone now

I screenshotted a bunch.

[The_Dude]

Originally Posted by Little Red L98.

I screenshotted a bunch.

[Little Red L98.]

Originally Posted by The_Dude

I asked that dude if he was one of the dangerous ones. That was his response. Dude is way out there. Shocking.

[Little Red L98.]

.

[snide]

Welcome @StudleyJames!

[UniqueDoug]

Originally Posted by Little Red L98.

.

I’m curious, did you like it better when it was a free-for-all or when it was clean enough to where you could participate again, ironically to land on the other side of the equation, complaining about heavy moderation. lol

[Little Red L98.]

Originally Posted by UniqueDoug

I’m curious, did you like it better when it was a free-for-all or when it was clean enough to where you could participate again, ironically to land on the other side of the equation, complaining about heavy moderation. lol

Let me put it this way Doug: I dropped in because someone posted a link here and I followed it in. People here were talking about getting banned and warnings and I thought I’d give it a go. I don’t care to argue politics. It’s pointless, but I got on a roll. People threw barbs, I threw them back. In the inauguration thread I wanted to see how far I could go. I got the thread locked and a PM stating a post was removed. I don’t know if that technically qualifies as a warning. If the knuckle dragger in the other thread replies, I’ll probably reply back. Just like the good old days, until I’m sick of it, which won’t take long.

As far as moderation, I guess it sucks more, if you want to look at it that way, because people were free to sling as much shit to whomever they wanted as long as they wanted, and now they can’t. Is it better or worse. You tell me.

[snide]

Welcome @69L46!
Welcome @Bluescorvette!

[JetMechZ16]

Originally Posted by Little Red L98.

Let me put it this way Doug: I dropped in because someone posted a link here and I followed it in. People here were talking about getting banned and warnings and I thought I’d give it a go. I don’t care to argue politics. It’s pointless, but I got on a roll. People threw barbs, I threw them back. In the inauguration thread I wanted to see how far I could go. I got the thread locked and a PM stating a post was removed. I don’t know if that technically qualifies as a warning. If the knuckle dragger in the other thread replies, I’ll probably reply back. Just like the good old days, until I’m sick of it, which won’t take long.

As far as moderation, I guess it sucks more, if you want to look at it that way, because people were free to sling as much shit to whomever they wanted as long as they wanted, and now they can’t. Is it better or worse. You tell me.

It's Facebook all over again.

[JetMechZ16]

Well I bumped a thread about Barns and changed my Avi to a Barn for a couple days now and no one has banned me. They did finally lock the thread though.

[CuzzinJack]

Originally Posted by UniqueDoug

I’m curious, did you like it better when it was a free-for-all or when it was clean enough to where you could participate again, ironically to land on the other side of the equation, complaining about heavy moderation. lol

The problem is inconsistency in applying the rules because they are interpreted differently by each mod..

Posting in P&R is now like walking through a minefield .
The ''denigration of others'' rule , for example , can be used for a multitude of reasons any time a mod feels like using it .

YMMV ..

Yeah , I know ----You didn't ask for my opinion..

[Steve_R]

Originally Posted by JetMechZ16

Well I bumped a thread about Barns and changed my Avi to a Barn for a couple days now and no one has banned me. They did finally lock the thread though.

I got an infraction and brief vacation when I had a photo of a barn for my avatar. Current avatar seems to be okay though.

[UniqueDoug]

Originally Posted by Little Red L98.

Let me put it this way Doug: I dropped in because someone posted a link here and I followed it in. People here were talking about getting banned and warnings and I thought I’d give it a go. I don’t care to argue politics. It’s pointless, but I got on a roll. People threw barbs, I threw them back. In the inauguration thread I wanted to see how far I could go. I got the thread locked and a PM stating a post was removed. I don’t know if that technically qualifies as a warning. If the knuckle dragger in the other thread replies, I’ll probably reply back. Just like the good old days, until I’m sick of it, which won’t take long.

As far as moderation, I guess it sucks more, if you want to look at it that way, because people were free to sling as much shit to whomever they wanted as long as they wanted, and now they can’t. Is it better or worse. You tell me.

So if I’m hearing you correctly you really never cared for PRC or PR, and essentially just go over there to start continue or finish shit?

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by UniqueDoug

So if I’m hearing you correctly you really never cared for PRC or PR, and essentially just go over there to start continue or finish shit?

Don't try and corner him; he's actually mentioned(written) a few times that he went to PRC to troll, and make the wingers bang the keyboard.
And he also mentioned a few times that alcohol was involved at time of banging away.

And no; those were not his intentions every time...sometimes he posted his opinion and was dog piled because it didn't align with others.

[UniqueDoug]

Originally Posted by Strats-N-Vettes

Don't try and corner him; he's actually mentioned(written) a few times that he went to PRC to troll, and make the wingers bang the keyboard.
And he also mentioned a few times that alcohol was involved at time of banging away.

And no; those were not his intentions every time...sometimes he posted his opinion and was dog piled because it didn't align with others.

Pretty sweet gig, how much does LiLr pay you to be his spokesperson?

[DJ_Critterus]

Originally Posted by CuzzinJack

The problem is inconsistency in applying the rules because they are interpreted differently by each mod..

Posting in P&R is now like walking through a minefield .
The ''denigration of others'' rule , for example , can be used for a multitude of reasons any time a mod feels like using it .

YMMV ..

Yeah , I know ----You didn't ask for my opinion..

If they are ever smart enough to pull their heads out of their asses and remove the ****ing racist mod over there I might participate more.

[Steve_R]

Originally Posted by DJ_Critterus

If they are ever smart enough to pull their heads out of their asses and remove the ****ing racist mod over there I might participate more.

Why? It's clear IB doesn't like OT or P&R, but you still want to participate? Do you like beating your head against a wall too?

[DJ_Critterus]

Originally Posted by Steve_R

Why? It's clear IB doesn't like OT or P&R, but you still want to participate? Do you like beating your head against a wall too?

No, but I do enjoy discussing politics...jsut not when a racist is moderating and posting anything that might hurt somebody's feelings is an infraction.

They are all a bunch of pussies over there...big sloppy hairy 1970's huge bush porn pussies.

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by UniqueDoug

Pretty sweet gig, how much does LiLr pay you to be his spokesperson?

Millions in Bitcoin......laughing my way to the bank.

[Strats-N-Vettes]

Originally Posted by DJ_Critterus

No, but I do enjoy discussing politics...

Go to PRC here, call out Jeff and Lakota.
Discuss politics with them.

I'm sure you'll be enlightened.