I think Hillary will.....

[Cybercowboy]

Originally Posted by Craig

He's certainly provided her with some rope...but I was thinking more about screwing investors and contractors out of their money, the line to sue him is ten miles long.

The percentage of people who contracts, does business with, or invests in his ventures who sue him is minuscule. BTW, if you are in business and have never been sued, it's almost an anomaly in today's litigious society. And no, just because they sue doesn't mean they were "screwed over".

[Cybercowboy]

Originally Posted by aerovette

I'll pose a question I posed to a libtard friend of mine...

If your purse is stolen and you say "Hey purse thief, if you come across my prescription, I'd really like to have it back". Have you invited them to take your purse?

It was ridiculous. If they have them, they have had them for years. These emails are from 2009-2012. The server that contained them is in some storage room at FBI headquarters, the hard drive removed, and it hasn't been powered on in years. So exactly how is that encouraging Russia to hack government servers? The mere idea that the MSM thought they could even make it into an issue of Trump doing so tells you all you need to know about what they think about American voters.

[Craig]

Originally Posted by Cybercowboy

... And no, just because they sue doesn't mean they were "screwed over".

I'm guessing they're not suing because they feel like they were treated fairly.

According to a USA Today investigation, he's been involved in 3500 lawsuits in the last 30 years, about half and half where he's the plaintiff or he's the defendant. I understand he's got his fingers in a lot of different ventures, but dayum...that's a lot.

[Cybercowboy]

Originally Posted by Craig

I'm guessing they're not suing because they feel like they were treated fairly.

According to a USA Today investigation, he's been involved in 3500 lawsuits in the last 30 years, about half and half where he's the plaintiff or he's the defendant. I understand he's got his fingers in a lot of different ventures, but dayum...that's a lot.

But, of course, Hillary - who hasn't built a damn thing, has never been involved in any lawsuit. Right?

Probably 1000 of those lawsuits were people who wanted to stop him from building something, upgrading a golf course, or just in general being a PITA. Note that out of all those lawsuits, they have to scrape around to find even a stupid story like Trump University. Literally the woman who first filed that suit was found on video saying that she actually thought it was pretty great. When this was found out, the judge just replaced her as the plaintiff with someone else that wasn't on video saying it was great and turned it into a class action suit. I mean, just WTF? But, you know, it's not political. No, of course not. Keep on believing fairy tales there Craig.

[Craig]

Okay...

[Cybercowboy]

Hillary Clinton has a seizure on camera - YouTube

[Olustee bus]

Good point. And, I think he better start to tone down his crazy stuff soon or it could be too late.

[GEODON]

Originally Posted by bsmith

But her supporters don't care, and make excuses for them all.
I'm afraid it is her race to lose.

its a sales pitch bro. And people are going to pick the better closer thats all it is. The people uptop they eat off the people on the bottom

[GEODON]

Does anyone know the % of people who dont vote?

[Cybercowboy]

Originally Posted by Olustee bus

Good point. And, I think he better start to tone down his crazy stuff soon or it could be too late.

That's what they've been saying for 13 months now. It's always just inches away from Peak Trump, nowhere to go but down now. Yawn.

I predict we'll reach Peak Trump in the middle of his second term.

[Cybercowboy]

Originally Posted by GEODON

Does anyone know the % of people who dont vote?

Do you know what presidential candidate got more primary votes than any other candidate in their party in history this year?

[Cybercowboy]

LOL, and now on Drudge. Clinton campaign server got hacked, and they refused to cooperate with the FBI. So that's what Assange was talking about the other day.

[GEODON]

Originally Posted by Cybercowboy

Do you know what presidential candidate got more primary votes than any other candidate in their party in history this year?

I dont even know what primary votes mean. I dont vote

[04 commemorative]

Originally Posted by 6spdC6

He will have her pissing herself so bad there will be a quart of yellow liquid on the floor by her feet. No bathroom breaks this time in the middel of a debate!

He is not afraid of her and will not kiss her ass the way those two latest phu*king rinos did when they were runing against the articulate half negro.

She is a lying, criminal, big mouth bitch, we know it he knows it but a hell of a lot more people will here what he has to say about kunt breath Hillary!

Fixed

[Cybercowboy]

Originally Posted by GEODON

I dont even know what primary votes mean. I dont vote

Ah, that's interesting.

[MrPeabody]

Originally Posted by Cybercowboy

Ah, that's interesting.

And very reassuring.

[Iron Chef]

Originally Posted by MrPeabody

And very reassuring.

Amen to that.

[GEODON]

Originally Posted by MrPeabody

And very reassuring.

not my world I know my place.

curious to know have you ever felt lied to by a candidate?

[MrPeabody]

Originally Posted by GEODON

not my world I know my place.

curious to know have you ever felt lied to by a candidate?

Of course. Every single one of them. You can't get above the level of small town city councilman without being a crook in this country. And most of those city councilmen are crooks also.

But living in a state with ballot initiatives like California, there is always a reason to participate in voting.

[GEODON]

Originally Posted by MrPeabody

Of course. Every single one of them. You can't get above the level of small town city councilman without being a crook in this country. And most of those city councilmen are crooks also.

But living in a state with ballot initiatives like California, there is always a reason to participate in voting.

so would it be fair to say that one doesnt need to know everything about politics to see them on tv and get a feeling if they are a true genuine honest person?

Does one need to know about politics to be a qualified voter?