Medicare

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by Chris Fowler

Trying to find where he spoke for them in what you quoted...

What, are two a team?

[VITE1]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

You may want to check with someone who is on Medicare first, before you speak for them.

Why?

It is going broke. It ether gets fixed or it goes bankrupt.

What are the intelligent and realistic solutions?

[prospero63]

Originally Posted by VITE1

Why?

It is going broke. It ether gets fixed or it goes bankrupt.

What are the intelligent and realistic solutions?

I believe they are posting crybaby images and potatoes.

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by VITE1

Why?

It is going broke. It ether gets fixed or it goes bankrupt.

What are the intelligent and realistic solutions?

One side has to give up the My-Way or No-Way attitude …

[prospero63]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

One side has to give up the My-Way or No-Way attitude …

Great. As soon as your side does that, get back with our side.

[VITE1]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

One side has to give up the My-Way or No-Way attitude …

So tell BHO and his pack of suck ups to start talking. They have made NO proposals other than the Obamacare fiasco that take 500 Billion from Medicare and nothing else.

When they have a proposals VS just running a Mediscare program to piss people off until 2012 and then spring massive cuts on them. Typical Progressive nonsense. "Your proposal Sucks and will hurt people and our proposal will be all sugar and honey just pass the bill to find out whats in the bill.

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by VITE1

So tell BHO and his pack of suck ups to start talking. They have made NO proposals other than the Obamacare fiasco that take 500 Billion from Medicare and nothing else.

When they have a proposals VS just running a Mediscare program to piss people off until 2012 and then spring massive cuts on them. Typical Progressive nonsense. "Your proposal Sucks and will hurt people and our proposal will be all sugar and honey just pass the bill to find out whats in the bill.

I agree … the Democrats should produce a proposal, and then the Republicans can do what they’ve done for the last two years.

But at least they can stop saying; they didn’t show me theirs”.

Sooner or later, the President needs to step in and show some Adult Leadership.

[VITE1]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

I agree … the Democrats should produce a proposal, and then the Republicans can do what they’ve done for the last two years.

But at least they can stop saying; they didn’t show me theirs”.

Sooner or later, the President needs to step in and show some Adult Leadership.

He did. No one liked it.

Medicaid
The Republican plan would convert the federal share of Medicaid spending into a block grant "that gives states the flexibility to tailor their Medicaid programs to the specific needs of their residents." Republicans envision savings of $735 billion by 2022, compared with Obama's budget proposal earlier this year.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, in an analysis of the GOP plan, says federal payments for Medicaid under the proposal "would be substantially smaller than currently projected amounts."

Moreover, although flexibility for states might translate into new efficiencies, the cuts in federal funding "would probably require states to reduce payments to providers, curtail eligibility for Medicaid, provide less extensive coverage to beneficiaries, or pay more themselves than would be the case under current law," the CBO says.

A White House outline says Obama's plan will "make Medicaid more flexible, efficient and accountable without resorting to block granting the program" or reducing coverage for seniors in nursing homes. He aims for Medicaid savings of at least $100 billion over 10 years.

Obama vs. Paul Ryan: five ways their debt plans differ - Medicaid - CSMonitor.com

And then failed in the Senate.

http://amyproctor.squarespace.com/bl...in-senate.html

Obama Budget Fails 0-97 in Senate
Thursday, May 26, 2011 at 11:43AM
Obama’s budget couldn’t garner even one vote….

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by VITE1

He did. No one liked it.


….

Leadership is not about being Liked or your decisions being Liked.

Ask any child.

[VITE1]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

Leadership is not about being Liked or your decisions being Liked.

Ask any child.

And no one followed.

Your attitude sucks. The Ryan plan offers a proposal that LEADS yet all you do is threw bombs and oblique insults at it and the Pubs. Yet when chosen one offered a plan to a Senate that has a chance to support it with a larger percentage of Dems no one voted for it. Was it failure of BHO leadership, since he just threw the plan out there and did nothing more, or the Dem leadership which ran from it Screaming the Pubs plan would kill Medicare.

You are just a troll with an agenda.

[mrvette]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

Leadership is not about being Liked or your decisions being Liked.

Ask any child.

THIS adult would piss off a LOT of children, for sure......

repudiate the debt, shut it all down, fire the underwater basketweavers,

pull our men outta the rest of the world, guard our borders like a Diebold....

and YES, it can be done....

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by mrvette

THIS adult would piss off a LOT of children, for sure......

repudiate the debt, shut it all down, fire the underwater basketweavers,

pull our men outta the rest of the world, guard our borders like a Diebold....

and YES, it can be done....

I guess if won the Presidency you would expect the opportunity to Lead.


Correct.

[mrvette]

I"d get stuff done and not pull punches on ANY enemy....domestic or foreign....

clean house, NO prisoners.....

NO public employee has a RIGHT to a job, they DO have responsibility to carry out the mission, however....

if not, fired on the spot, NO benefits....

underwater basketweavers will NOT be rehired, under ANY circumstances....

let the children cry.....

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by mrvette

I"d get stuff done and not pull punches on ANY enemy....domestic or foreign....

clean house, NO prisoners.....

NO public employee has a RIGHT to a job, they DO have responsibility to carry out the mission, however....

if not, fired on the spot, NO benefits....

underwater basketweavers will NOT be rehired, under ANY circumstances....

let the children cry.....

If I were you, I'd make sure to be behind business end of any order and not in front

[mrvette]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

If I were you, I'd make sure to be behind business end of any order and not in front

Effen' A man.....besides, that's what the SS is for....

[RedLS1GTO]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

I agree … the Democrats should produce a proposal, and then the Republicans can do what they’ve done for the last two years.

Out of curiosity, what are you saying that the Republicans have done for the last 2 years?

You do realize that for the last 2 years the Republicans were the minority in both the Senate and the House meaning that the Democrats had complete control, right?



...and just to clarify for you Chas, when I said minority, I was not calling them black.

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by RedLS1GTO

Out of curiosity, what are you saying that the Republicans have done for the last 2 years?

You do realize that for the last 2 years the Republicans were the minority in both the Senate and the House meaning that the Democrats had complete control, right?



...and just to clarify for you Chas, when I said minority, I was not calling them black.

I'm sorry, my Bad, so what you're saying is, the Minority Party is not expected to do anything.

Got it, I was wondering why.

[RedLS1GTO]

Originally Posted by RedLS1GTO

Out of curiosity, what are you saying that the Republicans have done for the last 2 years?

Originally Posted by ChasC5

I'm sorry, my Bad, so what you're saying is, the Minority Party is not expected to do anything.

Got it, I was wondering why.

I asked a simple question. I know that you have a hard time understanding so I will ask it again.

You said in your post that "Republicans can do what they’ve done for the last two years."

What did you mean by that?

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by RedLS1GTO

I asked a simple question. I know that you have a hard time understanding so I will ask it again.

You said in your post that "Republicans can do what they’ve done for the last two years."

What did you mean by that?

I gave you my answer ... if you don't except it ... fine.

[RedLS1GTO]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

I gave you my answer ... if you don't except it ... fine.

You mean this?

Originally Posted by ChasC5

I'm sorry, my Bad, so what you're saying is, the Minority Party is not expected to do anything.

Got it, I was wondering why.

How does that answer the question of what you meant when you said "Republicans can do what they’ve done for the last two years."??