how much value would you put on the opinion of someone who...

[Joecooool]

Originally Posted by RedLS1GTO

So we should have also left Hitler to go about his business... right?

Hitler initiated WW2. He attacked several of our allies. Saddam did not.

Feeding and housing?? You really think that 47% of Americans would starve and be homeless without welfare? The truth is that you support a ridiculous leftist wealth distribution agenda while at the same time gaining votes for the libtard in charge, and this is how you do it. It isn't about the poor starving kids...

47% of Americans are not on welfare. And your assessment of the "truth" is bullshit.

When either of those countries killes HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of people with chemical weapons, please let me know.

Oh, so that is now the barometer you want to use? Guess if Kim Jong-il just shoots them you are cool with it.

By the way, it had been more than 15 years after the chemical weapons when we took out Saddam. That's not to justify their use, just to point out how laughably absurd it is that you would then have to resort to using that as the primary justification for taking him out.

What you also failed to notice is that unlike you... I make no bullsh*t hypocritical claim of the moral high ground.

Yes you did. And you did it here in this post too.

I'll gladly admit that my views are formed in the best interest of myself and my country.

If you were looking out for your country you would stop defending this stupid shit.

[Joecooool]

Originally Posted by TxAg

How about you back up this claim with some facts and sources.

Don't think for one second I'm taking anything you say/post at face value.

If you are too dumb to look up the countries I posted, putting up links isn't going to help.

[Joecooool]

Originally Posted by PortDawg

Chemical Weapons Usage

Saddam was an asshole, there is no doubt about it. There is also no doubt about his killing his own people. But to try to state that this is why we went into Iraq is simply nonsense.

In fact its worse. Its dishonest.

[RedLS1GTO]

Originally Posted by Joecooool

Hitler initiated WW2. He attacked several of our allies. Saddam did not.

Oh really?

I could have sworn that Saddam launched hundreds of missiles into Israeli cities and took over the entire country of Kuwait (both allies BTW). Am I mistaken in that memory?

...and the rest of your leftist dribble wasn't even worth reading.

“Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.”

-Winston Churchill

You're over 30... right?

[Joecooool]

Originally Posted by RedLS1GTO

Oh really?

I could have sworn that Saddam launched hundreds of missiles into Israeli cities and took over the entire country of Kuwait (both allies BTW). Am I mistaken in that memory?

Yea and we even fought a war over that.

Twelve years earlier.

[RedLS1GTO]

Originally Posted by Joecooool

Hitler initiated WW2. He attacked several of our allies. Saddam did not.

Originally Posted by Joecooool

Yea and we even fought a war over that.

Twelve years earlier.

Ahhhh... thanks for the clarification. When you said Saddam didn't attack our allies, I took that to mean that Saddam didn't attack our allies. I forgot that I had to translate to include the liberal spins and caveats. Silly me.


Good idea ending so many of your posts lately with . It shows that even you realize how laughable the sh*t you say really is.

[AC54ME]

Originally Posted by Joecooool

Quote:
increased the was gathering it's information from high ranking officers within Saddam's own military[/U]... Saddam believed he had a viable nuclear program as evidenced by his refusal for UN inspections and internal CIA intel confirmed as much...

This is simply a lie. He was well aware of his situation.

1. Have you taken the opportunity to READ the CIA report noted above? If not I strongly recommend you do, although I hold little confidence you will.

2. Bush, along with others, was provided the information, by the DOWNSIZED CIA (over 20% the communist Clinton ordered to placate the other communists in the Democratic Party). And you have the gall to infer he was aware the information was bogus? Well - PROVE IT. Read through the transcripts of the investigation(s) and SHOW US you have a VALID point.

I am going to ignore the rest of your rant - as in most of your positions it would take way to much energy on my part to show the inconsistencies, the lies and deflections you regurgitate.