Hunter a no show at deposition !

[Bill]

Originally Posted by Swany00

yes we will, he ****ed up big time

Because the DoJ is going to punish him for this particular thing, despite trying to slow walk, downplay, and ultimately under charge Hunter, complete with trying to make the whole thing go away with a sweetheart plea deal?

Has something changed?

[Bill]

Originally Posted by Allan

What is the actual penalty for a No Show to a legislative body?
After all, it not a judicial body.
Inquiring minds want to know (and too lazy to do the research).

Peter Navaro, Trump's trade advisor, not a vocal MAGA voice, just a policy guy hired on to negotiate trade deals in the best interest of the US, got convicted of exactly what Hunter just did.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...iser-january-6

Former Trump White House adviser found guilty of contempt of Congress


Peter Navarro, a senior trade adviser, had refused to cooperate with the investigation of the House January 6 committee
Guardian staff and agencies
Thu 7 Sep 2023 17.11 EDT
First published on Thu 7 Sep 2023 16.15 EDT

A White House adviser to Donald Trump was found guilty of contempt of Congress on Thursday when he refused to cooperate with an investigation of the deadly January 6 attack on the US Capitol.

Peter Navarro, a senior trade adviser during Trump’s presidency and who had promoted his baseless claims of mass voter fraud, was convicted in Washington’s federal courthouse after a short trial.

He was convicted of two misdemeanor counts of contempt of Congress, both punishable by up to a year behind bars.

Judge Amit Mehta scheduled Navarro’s sentencing for 12 January.

Navarro had been subpoenaed in February 2022 by the House committee investigating how and why Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol on 6 January 2021, interrupting certification of Joe Biden’s election victory.

The committee thought he might have more information about any connection between those claims and the attack on Congress.

But Navarro did not hand over any emails, reports or notes. When the date came for him to testify before the committee, he did not show up.

A defense attorney, Stanley Woodward, told the jury Navarro did get in touch with committee staffers but asked them to talk to Trump to see what information he intended to be protected by executive privilege. That never happened, Woodward said.

Prosecutors, though, said Navarro should have handed over what material he could have and flagged any questions or documents believed to be protected under executive privilege. They said much of the material the committee sought was already publicly available.

“Peter Navarro made a choice. He chose not to abide by the congressional subpoena,” prosecutor Elizabeth Aloi said. “The defendant chose allegiance to former president Donald Trump over compliance to the subpoena.”

Navarro, a former economics professor, was the second Trump aide to face criminal charges after refusing to cooperate with the House committee.
skip past newsletter promotion

Steve Bannon, a sometime White House adviser and full-time far-right provocateur, was convicted of two counts of contempt of Congress and sentenced to four months in prison. He has been free while appealing the verdict.

On Thursday after Navarro was found guilty, Woodward moved for a mistrial, saying that the jurors had taken an outdoor break near where protesters and media regularly gather outside the courthouse and came back with a verdict shortly after. Mehta did not immediately rule, but said he would consider written arguments on the issue.

The House January 6 committee completed its work in January, saying Trump criminally engaged in a “multi-part conspiracy” to overturn the lawful results of the 2020 election and failed to act to stop his supporters from attacking the Capitol.

Separately, the US justice department has charged Trump on four criminal counts related to his election subversion efforts. He also faces state 13 counts in Georgia, related to election subversion there.

So this crime is punishable by not only jail time, but also, no doubt, tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, which you lose regardless of whether you win or lose your case as the defendant. The process IS the punishment.

I'm sure this matter will eventually be dropped for Hunter, and his legal fees will be coming from kickbacks, DNC donors, or really, anywhere but from his own checking account.

Compare and contrast with Navaro and Bannon, who both have to spend their own money to fight this. Also consider that they actually formally worked in executive capacities for the Trump administration, so they actually have claims of executive privilege to make. Hunter was a de facto WH executive, in charge of bringing in the bribes, but I don't think they want to make that formal claim as a defense.