[Obamaconomy] ~ GE's Immelt to head new jobs panel

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by Peter Pan

I will give Obama credit he did pick a business man/woman vs one like himself who never has run a business, he is though running America into BR with all the red spending. At least Immelt only lost half of GE share holders net worth since he took over vs GM share holders getting the shaft and worthless stock and us taxpayers had to bail out all those union workers who were not at fault for any of GMs failures

Yep, only business men have been President.

I wouldn't worry about satifing anyone who is not interested in being satisfied.

[mrvette]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

Yep, only business men have been President.

I wouldn't worry about satifing anyone who is not interested in being satisfied.

Lemme no when U git back from da funny farm.....


have another beer.....

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by mrvette

Lemme no when U git back from da funny farm.....


have another beer.....

Nope, it's time for Jack.

[mrvette]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

Nope, it's time for Jack.

cheep crap.....

Crown....over rocks.....

U got no klass.....

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by mrvette

cheep crap.....

Crown....over rocks.....

U got no klass.....

Jack or Jim on the rock for me, crown also, if you have it. I don't have in my bar, so I drink what I have.

[Exotix]

Originally Posted by ChasC5

Jack or Jim on the rock for me, crown also, if you have it. I don't have in my bar, so I drink what I have.

... he even bashes on a mans' drink ... I tell ya .. I ...

[mrvette]

Originally Posted by Exotix

... he even bashes on a mans' drink ... I tell ya .. I ...

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by Exotix

... he even bashes on a mans' drink ... I tell ya .. I ...

A man needs to be good at something, why not.

[Peter Pan]

Originally Posted by VITE1

I got scared when I saw this.

[IMG][/IMG]

And to think people voted for him.

Bozo then and clueless now, just spend baby spend and all will be ok

[Peter Pan]

Originally Posted by Z06PDQ

the Greatest Capitalist of Our Time AKA the Oracle of Omaha/Warren Buffet knows a fellow capitalist when he sees one. that's why he voted for Obama & still supports him. you poor jackasses have let Beck,Rush,Palin & Co. dupe you into the Big Socialist Scare. joke's on you, boys!

So Buffet and Immelt both voted for him one has his business growing and the other's is worth 50% of when he took over, oh the president choose the loser to lead our economy out of the funk, Buffet only buys business, atleast in the past GE was creating items before going on the Buffet model of buying up business, has worked well for one and not so well for the other

[ChasC5]

Originally Posted by Peter Pan

Bozo then and clueless now, just spend baby spend and all will be ok

Jealous

[Exotix]

Originally Posted by Peter Pan

Bozo then and clueless now, just spend baby spend and all will be ok

You must've missed Bush neocon McConnell on Faux Noize Sunday making the connection of the U.S. Debt to economic growth ... (he was trying to make sense by agreeing with Obama) ...

I'm gonna have to ponder this *new-right Obama-is-a-one-term-Prez economic agenda* for a while ...

[Exotix]

ADP figures come ahead of U.S. government’s big monthly jobs report

Just in

Private employers add 187,000 jobs in Jan. - Business - Stocks & economy - msnbc.com



NEW YORK — U.S. private employers added more jobs than expected in January, underscoring views the employment picture is slowly improving.


The private sector added 187,000 jobs in January compared with a downwardly revised gain of 247,000 jobs in December, a report by payrolls processor ADP Employer Services showed on Wednesday.

The December figure was originally reported as a gain of 297,000 jobs.



"Bottom line, even with the Dec downward revision, the two month average is a solid 217,000 and certainly a positive for economic activity," said Peter Boockvar, equity strategist at Miller Tabak & Co in New York.

The January ADP figure was also above economist expectations for job gains of 145,000.

The ADP figures come ahead of the government's much more comprehensive labor market report on Friday, which includes both public and private sector employment.

However, ADP figures last month turned out to be much stronger than what the government report showed, adding to doubts about the reliability of ADP as a predictor of payrolls.

Even though most economic indicators lately have suggested the United States is picking up steam, job creation has been slow since the end of the recession in June 2009.

Analysts have closely watched data on private payrolls, which tend to show the bulk of new job gains.

Friday's Labor Department report is expected to show a rise in overall nonfarm payrolls of 145,000 in January, based on a Reuters poll of analysts, but a rise in private payrolls of 155,000.

A separate report Wednesday showed the number of planned layoffs at U.S. firms in January rose 20 percent from the previous month to 38,519, but the tally was still the lowest for a January since at least 1993.

Noting that January was typically a month of large job cuts, global outplacement company Challenger, Gray & Christmas said in its report that the slowdown in job cuts that began in the latter half of 2010 appeared to be continuing.




Video inside: January ADP employment report





What say you doom & gloomers ?

[ChasC5]

Here it comes, Deny.

[thkauffman]

Did you even read the article you posted???

[Exotix]

Originally Posted by thkauffman

Did you even read the article you posted???

Yeah why ?
Don't tell me you're gonna do a Scissors on me and suggest something else is there I'm not comprehending ...

[thkauffman]

Originally Posted by Exotix

Yeah why ?
Don't tell me you're gonna do a Scissors on me and suggest something else is there I'm not comprehending ...

Well, it's obvious you're not comprehending or didn't read the article. Otherwise you wouldn't be crowing the way you are.

[Exotix]

Originally Posted by thkauffman

Well, it's obvious you're not comprehending or didn't read the article. Otherwise you wouldn't be crowing the way you are.

Least see if some of the wacko leftover neocons from the Bush era state that it's because they won the House last November like they do now ...

[thkauffman]

Originally Posted by Exotix

Least see if some of the wacko leftover neocons from the Bush era state that it's because they won the House last November like they do now ...

You have nothing, as evidenced by you using Bush in an argument.

Libs are so predictable.

[Exotix]

Originally Posted by thkauffman

You have nothing, as evidenced by you using Bush in an argument.

Libs are so predictable.

Serious ... some the Bush neocons still in office have been taking credit for the improvong economy that magically only happened since last November ...