WTF Montana? State Seizes Couple's Daughter to Make Her a Tranny

[Bill]

In Montana. Montana. WTF?

This couple should have pretended to go along with whatever bullshit the state agents were pushing, then physically fled with their daughter to a safe state that protects kids from child molesters and child abusers. And that state is NOT Texas, because something in the same vein happened here as well. This is infuriating.

Twitter

[gs568]

That’s insane.

[Raazor]

News to us in MT

[Swany00]

Figured I'd see this brown shirt shit in Ca before Montana

[Raazor]

https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/29/m...y-transgender/

Nuk birth mother involved, suicidal, drugs... sounds like a lot going on and we may not have all the information provided by a Twitter Post.

[Torqaholic]

Might be more Californicators than Manatanians in that state now. Watched a video on Montana homeless a while back and other than the natural backdrop there didn't appear to be much difference between the two.

[Raazor]

Originally Posted by Torqaholic

Might be more Californicators than Manatanians in that state now. Watched a video on Montana homeless a while back and other than the natural backdrop there didn't appear to be much difference between the two.

They're not fond of our -45 temperature last Saturday

[Bill]

Originally Posted by Swany00

Figured I'd see this brown shirt shit in Ca before Montana

California took a Munchausen by Proxy Texas mother and her two sons in so that the mother could have one of the sons turned into a girl, against the wishes of the father who lives in Texas:

https://dallasexpress.com/state/new-...-younger-case/

New Developments in James Younger Case

By Eric Geist - Freelance Writer
Sep 8, 2022

The Dallas Express has obtained court documents in the latest round of the legal fight between Jeff Younger and Anne Georgulas regarding the custody and care of their two children.

The former couples’ legal fight has been dominated by a dispute over the care of one of their children, garnering the attention of state and national media, as well as elected officials across Texas, including Governor Greg Abbott.

Georgulas refers to the child as Luna, a transgender female, while Younger fiercely insists that the child is not transgender and uses the given name James.

In 2018, Georgulas filed a lawsuit to modify the existing custody agreement between her and Younger. According to CNN, “She wanted Younger to affirm the child with a girl’s name inside and outside the home, among other requests, essentially forcing the father to embrace the child’s ‘gender expressions’.”

The following October in 2019, a jury awarded full conservatorship of the child to Georgulas, which would have allowed her to make all medical decisions unilaterally for her child, including the administration of transgender hormones or even surgeries.

However, the presiding judge, Kim Cooks, overruled the jury a few days later, awarding joint custody to both Georgulas and Younger. This decision effectively barred Georgulas from making any medical decisions for the children, including transitioning the child she calls Luna to female, without their father’s consent.

This remained largely the status quo until August 2021, when Judge Mary Brown of the 301st District Court in Dallas County awarded Georgulas exclusive domain over the child’s residence, counseling, medications, education, and extracurricular activities, citing Younger’s failure “to timely make the payments of child support, medical support, and interest as ordered, and only paid his past due support after the motion for enforcement was filed.”

Brown’s ruling contained one significant victory for Younger, which maintained that Georgulas could not unilaterally provide the child with “hormonal suppression therapy, puberty blockers, and/or transgender reassignment surgery” without the father’s consent.

Now, in an August 2022 filing in the same court, Georgulas is seeking numerous changes to the orders that currently govern the custody and care of her children with Younger.

Claiming that Younger has not seen either of his children since July 2021, Georgulas requested that the court allow her to move anywhere in the United States without informing Younger of the location, as well as the freedom to change the children’s names and to travel internationally with them without Younger’s consent.

The Dallas Express reached Jeff Younger for comment by email on this latest filing by his ex-wife. When asked about the claim that he has not seen his children in over a year, Younger said:

“Judge Mary Brown gave me supervised visitation. The visitation would cost about $400-500 per visit. The psychologists appointed by the court would not let me change my son out of a dress at those visits. I refuse to participate in the psychological, emotional, and sexual abuse of my son – so I declined to visit under those conditions.”

Younger also claims he has attempted to speak to his children by phone numerous times but asserts that Georgulas has refused to allow that. He also claims he has written several letters but has “no indication” that his children have ever received them.

Younger also claims that Georgulas’ request to be allowed to move anywhere within the United States is a veiled attempt to move to a state more permissive of transitioning children’s genders, gain full custody of their children in its court system, and make medical decisions without his consent.

“She will finally be able to legally castrate my son,” claimed Younger.

Younger claims his ultimate goal is to “save my son and other Texas children” through political action and awareness.

“All I want to do is raise my son with the 50-50 custody ordered in the previous trial. This judge, Mary Brown, has determined that raising my son as a boy warrants removal of my parental rights. If this can happen to me, it can happen to any parent in Texas,” said Younger.

The Dallas Express reached out to Georgulas’ attorney Jessica Janicek by email and requested comment on the latest filing as well as several of Younger’s claims.

Janicek replied, “Unfortunately, I cannot comment on the case due to the sensitive nature of the topics, the goal to keep the children’s lives as private as possible, and the injunctions in this case about discussing the litigation to the public (in an effort to protect the children).”

[Swany00]

Originally Posted by Raazor

https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/29/m...y-transgender/

Nuk birth mother involved, suicidal, drugs... sounds like a lot going on and we may not have all the information provided by a Twitter Post.

suicidal and shit, probably way more to the story

[Raazor]

Originally Posted by Swany00

suicidal and shit, probably way more to the story

there usually is.

CNN recently posted that Biden's all for fixing the border and always has been indicating it's the Republican's fault.

Posting something doesn't necessarily make it true.

[Bill]

Originally Posted by Raazor

https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/29/m...y-transgender/

Nuk birth mother involved, suicidal, drugs... sounds like a lot going on and we may not have all the information provided by a Twitter Post.

I mean, with all due respect, so what? The birth mother wants her daughters tits chopped off? The daughter is suicidal? Hacking her to pieces isn't going to help any of that. The parents needed to get their child out of that environment, out of harm's way, as it were.

These sick, twisted deviants prey on weak kids, kids with emotional problems. And I can understand the parents....who would have thought this could happen in Montana? But at least now this is a cautionary tale for other Montana parents. If the state is trying to promulgate this shit on your kid.....FLEE THE STATE.

[Raazor]

Originally Posted by bill_daniels

I mean, with all due respect, so what? The birth mother wants her daughters tits chopped off? The daughter is suicidal? Hacking her to pieces isn't going to help any of that. The parents needed to get their child out of that environment, out of harm's way, as it were.

I doubt it is lying in a hospital bed ready to be hacked to pieces. just a hunch

[Raazor]

Here's an example:

Originally Posted by Torqaholic

Watched a video on Montana homeless a while back and other than the natural backdrop there didn't appear to be much difference between the two.

MT has less than 1,000 homeless in the Winter and they're 'housed'. They wouldn't survive without shelter.

But Torq posted the above, so it MUST be true.

[Anjdog2003]

Originally Posted by gs568

That’s insane.

ICNTL

[Torqaholic]

Originally Posted by Raazor

Here's an example:



MT has less than 1,000 homeless in the Winter and they're 'housed'. They wouldn't survive without shelter.

But Torq posted the above, so it MUST be true.

They're living in campers on the side of the road. It might be shelter but I don't consider that a home.

[Murray]

Montana…the red headed stepchild of the US

[Raazor]

Originally Posted by Torqaholic

They're living in campers on the side of the road. It might be shelter but I don't consider that a home.

8 of 'em might be.