Quote:
Originally Posted by Cybercowboy
No, he didn't. He had been briefed on new promising therapies and one of them involved breathing an aerosol steroid (like they gave him this weekend) that was boosted with a lung-safe antiseptic agent that killed bacteria, one that used UV light and was inserted into the bronchial tubes that killed the virus, and another that could be put into an IV. It was the morons on your side that turned that into "injecting bleach".
|
Yes, and as I have posted before, it is a well-known thing that many viruses are incredibly sensitive to UV light. As such, it has been theorized for at least a few decades, that if someone was horribly infected with a virus, that they could be subjected to a kind of "transfusion", where their own blood is extracted, exposed to UV light in some sort of machine to kill the virus, and then injected back into the patient, thereby killing the virus in their blood over a short period of time. This is what he was talking about, and if you listen to the whole discussion, it becomes obvious.
Honestly, I don't know of ANY real research or trials of such a thing, but it doesn't seem so far fetched to me. When someone needs extensive heart surgery, a "heart-lung machine" basically takes their blood out of their body, oxygenates it, and injects it back in while the surgery is under way. Not much of a leap to change from oxygenation to exposure to UV light IMO.