View Single Post
Old 12-31-2020, 1:01pm   #54454
Steve_R
A Real Barner
Points: 83,020, Level: 100
Activity: 97.8%
 
Steve_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: On the beach
Posts: 32,761
Thanks: 17,488
Thanked 33,722 Times in 11,852 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $1025333
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murray View Post
I obviously don’t know that answer but an educated guess is for the health experts to be guiding everyone back to the way it was.

Here when we opened things up it was done in 10-14 day increments (incubation period)

If numbers continued to go down then more restrictions were eased. I expect the same to happen again.
Let me explain my question a bit more: Nobody ever really said what objective criteria (case rate, death rate, hospital/ICU capacity, etc.) was used to implement anything. Until somebody or some agency defines what objective criteria will be used, and the goals, for easing various restrictions, it will be a mix of advice from various cities, counties, states, provinces and countries, with no agreement - which is exactly what is going to happen. Some places are locked down, some aren't, even though case rates are similar. Some places don't have mask mandates, some do. Some have restrictions on public and even family gatherings, some don't. Etc. Etc. Etc.
Steve_R is online now  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Steve_R For This Useful Post: