Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco Vette
Thanks for the responses so far. Good thoughts.
As for myself, I would offer that what is "fair" should be assessed not only in the short term but in the long term as well. Since rewarding the producers is how to insure that anothre pie is baked, it would seem to me that that version is inherently more "fair." Thoughts?
|
While it sounds good remember that producers can turn into takers and Vice Versa.
What we need to have is the law. And the laws sole duty is to maintain as level a playing field as possible. So when the Producers get so powerful they cannot stifle anyone from trying.And the law should prevent the takers, when reproducing into a majority, from taking from producers simply due to their numbers. Rewarding failure and stupidity is neither fair nor a recipe for a solid civilization.
And that law should allow the freedom to move up as well as down the food chain.
There is no fair. There is only winners and losers. And sometimes luck. But their is Never fair.