View Single Post
Old 07-15-2018, 5:15pm   #144
Giraffe (He/Him)
Goldilocks
Barn Stall Owner #905

Bantayan Kids '13,'15
Points: 110,810, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
 
Giraffe (He/Him)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: My butt's been wiped.
Posts: 30,981
Thanks: 5,227
Thanked 16,607 Times in 7,133 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $1009320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlton_fritz View Post
I have never seen anyone using one. Sigma and Tamron have made 600mm affordable to more people, but only in a zoom. They can't match the image quality of a foxed 600mm, but the price is much lower. Of course Nikon just announced a camera that does 3000mm. The P1000. It looks amazing too.
Come to MN in January during Eagle season. You'll see them.

The Tamron/Sigma 100- 600 is EVERYWHERE. I've shot both and I'd give the edge to the Sigma as it's a bit better at 600. I think people are buying these things for the 600 end in many cases. If I didn't have the Canon 100-400 II I'd have one in a minute.

I've talked to many a shooter with these and while there's a few that understand what it takes to capture a bird in flight, a whole lot of them complain their shots are soft. Typically the conversation turns to settings and low and behold they're expecting consistent shots at 1/800 sec and below. They'll get lucky from time to time but by and large that's just too slow.

Dead duck here was at 1/1600 sec.
Attached Thumbnails
6.24.18 Keller duck.jpg  

Giraffe (He/Him) is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Giraffe (He/Him) For This Useful Post: