View Single Post
Old 03-28-2011, 12:06pm   #10
Mark C5
Barn Raising I
Points: 4,378, Level: 44
Activity: 0%
 
Mark C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 1,240
Thanks: 63
Thanked 322 Times in 144 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $167111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Critterus View Post
that may be true, but I thinknot having any kind of safety to be an issue. Yeah, I know Glock has the internal safety mechanisms, but I want one more layer of protection to keep the gun from firing a round unless I pull the trigger on purpose.
My use of the word stupidity may have been a bit harsh. A better way to have said it would have been "no amount of safety's will protect you from negligence".

If you are negligent in your handling of a Glock you are just as apt to be negligent in your handling of a 1911 or any other weapon, in my opinion. Negligent handling of a weapon carries a high likelihood of "accidental discharge" over time.

In this instance the guy admitted he was negligent. He was aware he had a problem for some time and did nothing to correct the problem. It was only a matter of time. I would submit he would be just as negligent with any other weapon and while perhaps not under the same circumstances he would have eventually experienced a similar result. The actual physical cause is irrelevant. The real cause is negligence.
Mark C5 is offline   Reply With Quote