View Single Post
Old 08-01-2021, 3:02pm   #72
Aerovette
Chief Electrician
Barn Stall Owner #7734

Bantayan Kids '15
Points: 106,034, Level: 100
Activity: 99.0%
 
Aerovette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The corner of Cease Rd. and Desist St.
Posts: 44,318
Thanks: 16,995
Thanked 33,615 Times in 13,605 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $107478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C3C7NIC View Post
Been following several studies with respect to the use of Ivermectin, as I was following HCQ initially. HCQ initially got emergency approval from the FDA, but emergency use approval was withdrawn due to inefficacy.

This is a good recent update by Mayo Clinic updating some of the most recent treatment considerations.


https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-...s/faq-20485627


Clearly, there is a big difference between clinically proven treatments and anticdotal evidence, but unless we try new things how will will we find new treatments. This is the part that intrigues me.
HCQ got a bum rap and was squelched for pure greed. It was NEVER intended to be used alone as a treatment. Its efficacy was as part of a one/two punch.

Why allow for a $9.00 solution and pass up a 20 trillion dollar potential to make money?
Aerovette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aerovette For This Useful Post: