View Single Post
Old 12-14-2010, 3:10pm   #8
Tinkerbell in Texas
A Real Barner
Points: 9,135, Level: 66
Activity: 3.5%
 
Tinkerbell in Texas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,339
Thanks: 566
Thanked 161 Times in 100 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $5233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exotix View Post
Fine ... I need to know the specifics on this satellites' *fields of array* with regards to data collection ...

Say for instance NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory which was touted as a technological breaktrhough in mapping Earth's carbon dioxide levels and where it unfortuantely crashed into the ocean near Antarctica just after launch back in 2009 ...

Apparently it had the sophistication of the Hubble gamma particle collection that was able to confirm the universe is at least 13 Billion years old ...


The exotix wishes to be impressed with this kind of science and technology ... make no mistake ... I wanna know if Global Warming is farce or fact as if it's gonna make a difference in my lifetime and wether or not Obamas march to socialism/communism/national socialist fascism will in fact halt the march of technological oblivion ... of course by Dec. 21, 2012 ... the end of days ... that is, as soon as we commence with the rapture at any moment ...


I'm sure you can look up that information.

I didn't know you were so religious, Exotix!! Do you also practice as much as you preach?
Back on topic.....so now you DON"T think NASA's satellite is correct??? So which is it.....all of NASA's data is correct/valid, some of NASA's data is correct/valid (and which data) or none of NASA's data is correct/valid?????
We're all holding our breath (well not really) to hear what proclaimation the great and all powerful Exotix is about to issue.....

Tinkerbell in Texas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tinkerbell in Texas For This Useful Post: