View Single Post
Old 12-21-2019, 12:48pm   #1
Mick
A Real Barner
Points: 17,912, Level: 92
Activity: 46.4%
 
Mick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 7,516
Thanks: 1,950
Thanked 7,055 Times in 3,116 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $12721
Default Is it just me, or does the "second article" have a fatal flaw?

It accuses Trump of "obstruction of Congress" for refusing to comply with the House's "subpoenas". But if I understand the process properly (always a major chance I don't), they never issued any subpoenas, only "letters of request", which have no legal ramifications for a failure to comply.

I thought the House had to have a vote to open an official "Impeachment Inquiry" in order to gain subpoena power. They skipped that step, since it would have come along with at least some due process for Trump, so they went directly from committee investigation to a vote on the articles without the House ever voting to open an official investigation.

For months now, the Democrats and the media have been conflating the terms "letter of request", and "subpoena", but in this case, isn't it the crux of the biscuit?
Mick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mick For This Useful Post: