Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunder22
Wait..... You did just type this didn't you?
"How is stealing their IP any different from me walking in your home and stealing your possessions and then your car?"
 |
Correct.
And like I said, I am saying that might be the *only* exception to this rule I see as being "ok".
A bunch of prick Hollywood aholes with $100+ million who are pissed about missing out on a small portion of royalties.
Id say missing out on 10% or 15% of profits is different than 100% of profits being stolen via government confiscation.
Since when has any Hollywood ahole lost 100% of profits?
Having a biotech develop a cure for cancer and it stolen means they lose 100% of profits. There's no middle ground. It's not like if their IP is stolen, they lose 10-15% like those Hollywood aholes.
They lose 100%.
Do you not see a difference?