Quote:
Originally Posted by RED-85-Z51
HLN has good coverage during the trial...but you may as well be watching The Sharpton show after hours, its only slightly more biased than Jane and Nancy.
its funny how these highly liberal hosts and shows, can show the Rachel Jeanelle testimony and at any point in time find excerpts and call her "highly Credible" and "an innocent victim beinh harassed by the defense"
|
You are right on Red. Two instances;
1 the first day. There was much discussion about Zimmermans "mind set" because he told the dispatcher that Those punks are always up to no good" and "they always get away with it" or something to that effect. The prosecution was pointing out that because Zimmerman said that, his mindset was anger towards the black race and young black males.
On day two, Martins friend testified that he called Zimmerman a "creepy ass cracka". No word was mentioned of Martins "mindset". In my opinion, the defence should have pounced on Martins "mindset". The only thing that the cnn idiot's said was that because Zimmerman was following Martin, zimmerman must have been the aggressor.
2 Day Four. Eye witness account saw Martin on top of Zimmerman. It was pretty damn clear after that testimony that Martin was the agressor. The stupid cnn host only said that Zimmerman clearly had a vigilante attitude.
CNN really should be ashamed.