View Single Post
Old 12-08-2010, 9:39am   #52
ChasC5
Banned
Points: 18,058, Level: 92
Activity: 0%
 
ChasC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Where Cons Fear
Posts: 7,146
Thanks: 369
Thanked 410 Times in 376 Posts
Gameroom Barn Bucks: $37320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinkerbell in Texas View Post
agreed, the "(R)'s" as you call them should have said "NO MORE".

So let me get this straight.......the tax cuts we're talking about are going to be EXTENDED.......meaning that there will be no additional monies stolen...I mean collected.
So if they weren't being collected they shouldn't now be missed!
Perhaps if Obama and posse hadn't run up the deficit they wouldn't be having this push back.
Wrong; the rate of spending didn’t change, to cover the lack of revenue, in fact it increased … starting back in 2001, and again in 2003!

This isn’t long division, its simple addition and subtraction.

The previous Administration didn’t cover its own spend and thus we’re paying for it … Big Time.

The Physical Responsible hawks didn’t speak up in 2001 and 2003 and not once during the two Wars.


ChasC5 is offline   Reply With Quote