Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
DNA evidence presented at OJ's trial showed that there was a ONE IN A BILLION chance that someone other than OJ committed the murders. The jury felt that one in a billion chance was not sufficient to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that OJ did it. You can come to your own conclusion if you want.
OJ was most definitely NOT "proven innocent". He was "found not guilty". There is a huge difference between the two.
And yes, as soon as I saw that thread, I thought "how long until Cumdawg locks this one?"
|
I disagree. It has come out that approximately 90% of the jury wanted payback for what they perceived a injustice in the Rodney King trial just prior. They had been shown only the beating portion of the tape (not the attack King instigated on the cops) and assumed it was racism. (Like they assume everything else is). Black celebrity kills two white people? HELL YES. That's the
real reason, nothing as logical as bad evidence.