The Vette Barn

The Vette Barn (https://www.thevettebarn.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics & Religion (https://www.thevettebarn.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=82)
-   -   the 10 Republican lies about the Bush Tax Cuts (https://www.thevettebarn.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3868)

Z06PDQ 09-30-2010 5:22pm

the 10 Republican lies about the Bush Tax Cuts
 
10 Republican Lies About the Bush Tax Cuts | Crooks and Liars

WKMCD 09-30-2010 5:44pm

You've got to be F'ing kidding me. That's the best your research could come up with. :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Take a break from the KoolAid and let your head clear.

Y2Kvert4me 09-30-2010 6:02pm

Why taxing the rich doesn't work

ChasC5 10-05-2010 12:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y2Kvert4me (Post 46733)

Instead of “reading” about “Why taxing the rich doesn’t work”, I can tell you “personally” “Why taxing the other 98% won’t work”! :D

Cobra4B 10-05-2010 12:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChasC5 (Post 47059)
Instead of “reading” about “Why taxing the rich doesn’t work”, I can tell you “personally” “Why taxing the other 98% won’t work”! :D

Over the past 70 years revenues as a percentage of GDP have always hovered between 17 and 20%.... what does that tell you? Taxing the Rich doesn't work... period. The only way to increase revenue is to increase GDP. That's not a right/left idea.... it's just simple economics and logic.

We have created a system in which the bottom 1/2 pays nothing yet still gets to vote... so of course they'll continue to vote for handouts and paying nothing. The top earners bear nearly all of the tax burden.

A progressive income tax is the definition of unfair.... move to a flat tax and create incentives for companies to invest in America. Capital is just economic energy... it follows the path of least resistance.

All this "tax the rich" bull**** is just a way to flame class warfare and keep the ignorant masses voting D.

ChasC5 10-05-2010 1:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobra4B (Post 47062)
Over the past 70 years revenues as a percentage of GDP have always hovered between 17 and 20%.... what does that tell you? Taxing the Rich doesn't work... period. The only way to increase revenue is to increase GDP. That's not a right/left idea.... it's just simple economics and logic.

We have created a system in which the bottom 1/2 pays nothing yet still gets to vote... so of course they'll continue to vote for handouts and paying nothing. The top earners bear nearly all of the tax burden.

A progressive income tax is the definition of unfair.... move to a flat tax and create incentives for companies to invest in America. Capital is just economic energy... it follows the path of least resistance.

All this "tax the rich" bull**** is just a way to flame class warfare and keep the ignorant masses voting D.


Part of what you say is correct … although, the concept of taking more for those who have little to give isn’t going to get you Jack in the short or long term! It’s a proven fact; those that are at the bottom half, as you say, was and still are considered Middle America. I have a lot of friends who fit in that category, and I can assure you, they aren’t looking for any handout from you or anyone else. The chances of their discretionary spending making its way into the economy is far greater than someone who is only going to use their discretionary spend on high-ticket items.



BTW; identifying the masses who vote D as ignorant, is about as intelligent as identifying the masses who vote R as Waco’s.

Once both sides of the argument begin to understand that basic concept … America will realize the benefits.



:cheers:

Z06PDQ 10-05-2010 5:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by WKMCD (Post 46732)
You've got to be F'ing kidding me. That's the best your research could come up with. :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Take a break from the KoolAid and let your head clear.

translation: "I have nothing,so here's some smileys & almost coherent banter." :seeya:

WKMCD 10-05-2010 5:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z06PDQ (Post 47080)
translation: "I have nothing,so here's some smileys & almost coherent banter." :seeya:

Not at all. The source of your information is so reproachable that it's not worth countering.

Z06PDQ 10-05-2010 5:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by WKMCD (Post 47081)
Not at all. The source of your information is so reproachable that it's not worth countering.

that line doesn't work anymore. you have to address the content of the article [not just the source] to be considered as having an argument. step up. :D

WKMCD 10-05-2010 6:08pm

And that would benifit anyone how? You're mind is made up and closed.

Sorry, I'm too busy employing 124 people.

I guess that makes me the target of your aggression.

Z06PDQ 10-05-2010 6:12pm

still got nuttin', huh? :lolsmile: try reading the article. :beer:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:38am.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 - 2024 The Vette Barn