The Vette Barn

The Vette Barn (https://www.thevettebarn.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://www.thevettebarn.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   NYT - Outdoors COVID Transmission as low as 0.1 Percent (https://www.thevettebarn.com/forums/showthread.php?t=125757)

BayouCountry 05-12-2021 5:17pm

NYT - Outdoors COVID Transmission as low as 0.1 Percent
 
In the NYTs of all places. I knew there was a reason I just shake my head every time I see someone outside wearing a face diaper.

Quote:

By David Leonhardt
May 11, 2021
When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new guidelines last month for mask wearing, it announced that “less than 10 percent” of Covid-19 transmission was occurring outdoors. Media organizations repeated the statistic, and it quickly became a standard description of the frequency of outdoor transmission.

GET THE MORNING BY EMAIL: Make sense of the day's news and ideas with this daily newsletter.
Sign Up
But the number is almost certainly misleading.

It appears to be based partly on a misclassification of some Covid transmission that actually took place in enclosed spaces (as I explain below). An even bigger issue is the extreme caution of C.D.C. officials, who picked a benchmark — 10 percent — so high that nobody could reasonably dispute it.

That benchmark “seems to be a huge exaggeration,” as Dr. Muge Cevik, a virologist at the University of St. Andrews, said. In truth, the share of transmission that has occurred outdoors seems to be below 1 percent and may be below 0.1 percent, multiple epidemiologists told me. The rare outdoor transmission that has happened almost all seems to have involved crowded places or close conversation.

Saying that less than 10 percent of Covid transmission occurs outdoors is akin to saying that sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year. (The actual worldwide number is around 150.) It’s both true and deceiving.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/11/b...dc-number.html

Steve_R 05-12-2021 6:48pm

Does this surprise anyone?

Bill 05-12-2021 6:52pm

Looks like you're more likely to be accosted by the blm thugs then you are to catch the Wu flu in NYC. The issue there is, you can protect yourself from the Wu flu, but it's illegal to protect yourself from the blm.

snide 05-12-2021 8:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bill_daniels (Post 1880853)
Looks like you're more likely to be accosted by the blm thugs then you are to catch the Wu flu in NYC. The issue there is, you can protect yourself from the Wu flu, but it's illegal to protect yourself from the blm.

Ain't that some shit.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:12pm.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 - 2024 The Vette Barn