Less than 10,000 C-19 deaths, says the CDC...
 

Yeah, I've kinda been pointing this shit out for awhile, but even I didn't guess they were off by 94%.

**** sakes.

The CDC silently updated their numbers this week to show that only 6% of all coronavirus deaths were related to the coronavirus alone. The rest of the deaths attributed to the China coronavirus are attributed to individuals who had other serious issues going on. Also, most of the deaths are related to very old Americans.

Anyway, I'm just passing this info around. It's incredibly obvious to anyone paying the least bit of attention.

At least it will all be over on November 3rd
So I hear anyways

Do you think we will see this on the fake news media outlets?

Masks. Wear them forever. Just because.

Nope.

I am thinking the dems are starting to realize this virus stuff along with the rioting, I mean peaceful protests, are not helping them. My guess is we will see more things "discovered" that will serve to put this virus behind us as far as being the pandemic shit.

My big fear is what are they going to politicize next to try and grab power?

Well, there are accusations that Ivanka's son did not build the LEGO White House she spoke of.

I may have to change my vote. :Jeff '79:

2020 the year people turned into clueless sheep. :yesnod:

The left wing idiots will do anything even hurt the American people to try to beat Trump. I believe all of the left's B.S. will back fire on the idiots and assure a Trump win. :cert:

TRUMP 2020

Can you post to the specific info that shows 10k? I hit the link and can’t find it.

I'm pretty sure they've been saying the whole time that if you don't have underlying conditions that you are probably safe. That it's the elderly and people with a bunch of health issues that are going to be dying. I've been hearing that from the very beginning. :confused5:

Something tells me that this will be a "Nicole-free" thread. :yesnod:

Yeah, when the US accounts for less than 5% of the world's population, has better healthcare than at least 75% of the rest of the world, has a much lower population density than many other countries, and still we account for 22% of the deaths, and you guys think someone has been cooking the books? Hell you say.

Let's see if this works... It's listed int the text for Table 3... they don't show it in the graph data that I could see.... On the average 2.6 additional conditions contributing to the death....

So if you take that 6% and multiply it by the death total (I found the current is 186,893 in the US) then you get a little over 11,000. About what Cyber posted in the OP.

Yup. We should have protected the elderly and sick all along. We shouldn’t have destroyed the economy. There are predictions of more than 10,000 excess cancer deaths over the next few years because of cancelled or delayed medical treatment due to the virus. Nobody wants to talk about those deaths either because they don’t count - unless you’re one of them.

:karen: :karen: :karen: :karen: :karen: :karen: :karen:

If they were saying it, then why are millions cowering in fear over it? Politicizing it? Nah, that couldn't be it.......

Simply means that the cause of death was due to COVID-19 and only COVID-19 6% of the time. The other 94% had an average of almost 3 additional serious conditions that under any other situation one or more would be the cause of death.

My comment only had to do with the fact that they did say, from the start, that it would for the most part only kill the old and sick.

And now the New York Times (of all places) is saying that up to 90% of positive COVID-19 tests should not be counted as positive because the tests are, essentially, too sensitive and pick up traces of infection in otherwise healthy, non-infectious individuals.

I guess the bloom is off the rose now.

And this comes off of the news last week where Texas walked back nearly all their numbers, which were grossly inflated due to "errors in reporting" somehow some way. Interesting that those "mistakes" always, and I do mean ALWAYS, go in one direction only.