PDA

View Full Version : Digital Display: Cincinnati man accused of 'sexting' 9-year-old


onedef92
02-10-2011, 11:17am
Cincinnati man accused of 'sexting' 9-year-old

CINCINNATI, OH - A Cumminsvile man is facing charges after police say he send lewd pictures to a 9-year-old girl.

Antonio Daria, 26, is charged with disseminating matter harmful to juveniles.

According to the arrest report, Daria sent reckless text messages to the girl about partying, and also sent a photo of his genitalia.

He sent the photos early Sunday morning, and was arrested Wednesday afternoon. He is being held in the Hamilton County Justice Center.

onedef92
02-10-2011, 11:17am
That is awful lowdown and dirty....

repo
02-10-2011, 11:21am
:beat:

HeatherO
02-10-2011, 1:06pm
wrong on every level for the douche bag, but I have to ask...
WTF is a 9 yr old doing with a cell phone? :willy:

C5SilverBullet
02-10-2011, 1:07pm
Don't ever send pictures of your junk, period.

carlton_fritz
02-10-2011, 1:15pm
Don't ever send pictures of your junk, period.
:iagree: with Bret

BAT
02-10-2011, 1:15pm
wrong on every level for the douche bag, but I have to ask...
WTF is a 9 yr old doing with a cell phone? :willy:

That was my first thought too

RedLS1GTO
02-10-2011, 1:24pm
I will be the last one to EVER defend somebody who does something like that but this story seems a little odd...

1.) Has anybody proven that the picture was meant to go to a 9 year old? Could it have been that some chick in a bar the night before gave him a fake number or something like that? What could possibly be gained out of sending things like that to a 9 year old... even if the person was a disturbed pedophile I still don't see the gain for him.

2.) Like was said above... WTF is a 9 year old doing with a cell phone?

joecaver
02-10-2011, 1:46pm
A 9 y.o. is a baby. Lock that mofo up and throw away the key. :beat:

Aerovette
02-10-2011, 1:53pm
I'm sure he thought she was at least 10.

I don't know how you accidentally send a picture like that.

When I send any pic it is to a contact, not a random, "just got it yesterday" number. If he did just get the number, why tf is he sending his junk to it? I think at a minumum I would send a couple preceeding texts to make sure I had the right number. Stupid gets what it deserves.

carlton_fritz
02-10-2011, 1:54pm
I gotta ask. Is it possible to enter a wrong digit, or the message gets sent to the wrong number by the carrier or something like that?

wicked_c6
02-10-2011, 2:12pm
I will be the last one to EVER defend somebody who does something like that but this story seems a little odd...

1.) Has anybody proven that the picture was meant to go to a 9 year old? Could it have been that some chick in a bar the night before gave him a fake number or something like that? What could possibly be gained out of sending things like that to a 9 year old... even if the person was a disturbed pedophile I still don't see the gain for him.

2.) Like was said above... WTF is a 9 year old doing with a cell phone?

I bought a cell for my daughter when she was 10. She takes the bus to and from school, and gets dropped off a mile from her aunts home in the afternoon. I want her to be able to call me in case of trouble.

wicked_c6
02-10-2011, 2:28pm
Don't ever send pictures of your junk, period.

I'll show VBOT my junk anytime...

http://0.tqn.com/d/housekeeping/1/0/G/HousekeepingJunkDrawer1.JPG

onedef92
02-10-2011, 2:28pm
wrong on every level for the douche bag, but I have to ask...
WTF is a 9 yr old doing with a cell phone? :willy:


Nuts! I know five-year-old kids with 3G phones! :crazy:

RedLS1GTO
02-10-2011, 2:56pm
I'm sure he thought she was at least 10.

I don't know how you accidentally send a picture like that.

When I send any pic it is to a contact, not a random, "just got it yesterday" number. If he did just get the number, why tf is he sending his junk to it? I think at a minumum I would send a couple preceeding texts to make sure I had the right number. Stupid gets what it deserves.

I agree completely that stupid gets what it deserves and in no way am I defending this guy but the intent greatly changes things in this case. A dumbass that accidentally sent a picture to a 9 year old is a completely different level than somebody who intentionally sent something like that to a 9 year old.

One is an idiot that needs to be kicked in the nuts repeatedly. The other is somebody who needs to be dismembered and die a horrific painful death.

ft laud mike
02-10-2011, 5:51pm
Ohio
:leaving: