[MovieLOL] Just How Many old Trek References Are In The New TREK? **SPOILERS**

[ApexOversteer]

If you haven't seen Star Trek Into Darkness, be aware the following video contains spoilers.

Oh, and due to language, this is NSFW too...

Mr. Plinkett - Star Trek: Into Reference - YouTube

[BuckyThreadkiller]

I have to admit when they mentioned where they got the small ship I did laugh out loud.

[OddBall]

haven't seen the movie, haven't seen the Ads.

Got just one question.

Is time travel involved in this movie in any way, shape, or form?

[carlton_fritz]

haven't seen the movie, haven't seen the Ads.

Got just one question.

Is time travel involved in this movie in any way, shape, or form?
No.

[onedef92]

Still on my summer must-peep list.

[Mike Mercury]

Holy crap was that guy's voice annoying.

he's probably not married (nor dating either).

[ApexOversteer]

haven't seen the movie, haven't seen the Ads.

Got just one question.

Is time travel involved in this movie in any way, shape, or form?

No.

That isn't entirely correct.

While no actual time traveling takes place in Into Darkness, the film is the continuation of the timeline from the 2009 film, so it is accurate to say that these events were directly affected by Nero and Spock Prime's time traveling, thus time traveling is involved.

[ApexOversteer]

I guess that would mean the "no" would be correct since the question said "this movie". :D

If the previous time traveling had no effect on this film, KNS would still be floating around deep space in the SS Botany Bay, to be discovered by the Enterprise...

[ApexOversteer]

I guess my point is that, because of previous time travel incidents, various events in Into Darkness happen, that would not have otherwise.

Carol Marcus being a weapons designer, KNS being linked directly to Starfleet, Starfleet itself being more militaristic.

All are a direct result of the change in the timeline. Time travel is involved, if not actually occurring.

[onedef92]

I guess my point is that, because of previous time travel incidents, various events in Into Darkness happen, that would not have otherwise.

Carol Marcus being a weapons designer, KNS being linked directly to Starfleet, Starfleet itself being more militaristic.

All are a direct result of the change in the timeline. Time travel is involved, if not actually occurring.


http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m111/onedef92/geek-434_zpsd0a17c6c.jpg

Sauce for the goose (and shit).

[OddBall]

Maybe I'll go see it then.

My biggest gripe with Star Trek is that they have just wore the hell out of the time-travel premise. It was great, that first time back in the '60s. After that, every other f'cking script is time travel. Gawd, I wish they'd come up with a new concept, plot mechanism, or an original thought for once.



oh, and just for the record; this broad that's playing Uhura just ain't got what Nichelle Nichols had.

And shouldn't Spock be banging Nurse Chapel anyway? As much as she was wet for Spock, they could have at least given her that.

And why no Yeoman Rand? I mean for chissakes, she was practically blowing Kirk on the bridge in the original series.


just sayin'...

[carlton_fritz]

That isn't entirely correct.

While no actual time traveling takes place in Into Darkness, the film is the continuation of the timeline from the 2009 film, so it is accurate to say that these events were directly affected by Nero and Spock Prime's time traveling, thus time traveling is involved.
That hair got split wide open.:shots:

[carlton_fritz]

Maybe I'll go see it then.

My biggest gripe with Star Trek is that they have just wore the hell out of the time-travel premise. It was great, that first time back in the '60s. After that, every other f'cking script is time travel. Gawd, I wish they'd come up with a new concept, plot mechanism, or an original thought for once.



oh, and just for the record; this broad that's playing Uhura just ain't got what Nichelle Nichols had.

And shouldn't Spock be banging Nurse Chapel anyway? As much as she was wet for Spock, they could have at least given her that.

And why no Yeoman Rand? I mean for chissakes, she was practically blowing Kirk on the bridge in the original series.


just sayin'...
Nurse Chapel is mentioned.

[OddBall]

Nurse Chapel is mentioned.

mentioned don't count. She's gotta get boned, by Spock with that seven-year boner those vulcans have.

[ApexOversteer]

That hair got split wide open.:shots:

That's nothing man, you should see the semantics of the real hardcore Trekkers, the ones that dress in Starfleet uniform to perform jury duty and give their cars NCC numbers...

[Kerrmudgeon]

What?....no 7 of 9?? :(

[OddBall]

Speaking of Vulcans,
Who was the first Vulcan chick to do it with a human.

T'pol?

[carlton_fritz]

That's nothing man, you should see the semantics of the real hardcore Trekkers, the ones that dress in Starfleet uniform to perform jury duty and give their cars NCC numbers...
:willy:

[carlton_fritz]

mentioned don't count. She's gotta get boned, by Spock with that seven-year boner those vulcans have.
The comment was about her location. I can't recall where it was.

[ApexOversteer]

Wait, what??

The Vulcan Pon Farr...

Every seven years Vulcans go into the Pon Farr, when they become aroused to the point of violence. The Pon Farr is so extreme, it can only be sated by mating with someone you share a bond with, or combat.

[DukeAllen]

Reading all these comments, I have to ask. Do your moms bring dinner down to the basement to you or do you just sit in a bean bag chair and eat Cheetos?
:D

[carlton_fritz]

Reading all these comments, I have to ask. Do your moms bring dinner down to the basement to you or do you just sit in a bean bag chair and eat Cheetos?
:D
http://i44.tinypic.com/35hk16o.jpg

[onedef92]

oh, and just for the record; this broad that's playing Uhura just ain't got what Nichelle Nichols had.


http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w132/spiritsongstress/Zoe-Saldana.jpg

*M-5 computer voice and shit* Non sequitur! Nichelle Nichols was hittin' no doubt, but ol' girl Zoe Saldana is fine as frog's hair!

[DukeAllen]

Nichelle owned that role. She's still fine. In ten years it'll be Zoe who?

[onedef92]

Nichelle owned that role. She's still fine. In ten years it'll be Zoe who?

Nah, Zoe's doin' just fine. Nichelle Nichols even gave her her blessing for the role, but hatah's gonna' hate. She'll be around as Uhura for as long as the current cast members have their tour of duty aboard the Enterprise.