SCOTUS Rules For Trump In Immunity Case

[KenHorse]

https://www.thevettebarn.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138545

[LATB]

Practically ends the J6 cases and the Georgia case (that’s basically already dead on the vine)

Of course if Trump was to lose the election they would die anyway. If he wins they will push it all to tie him up as much as possible.

[Onebadcad]

And some in here fail to understand that TRUMP was very good in preserving Our Constitution during his first four years, ie Supreme Court Appointments.

Even if you have great disdain for his personality, you need to understand a vote for TRUMP is a vote FOR AMERICA!!

[Swany00]

it's a travesty for the left because they couldn't destroy democracy quicker, but continue to blame pubs for destroying it.....**** them

[ZipZap]

Play the song now...

[Taurus]

Practically ends the J6 cases and the Georgia case (that’s basically already dead on the vine)

Of course if Trump was to lose the election they would die anyway. If he wins they will push it all to tie him up as much as possible.

No, not really. It just kicks those cases back down to the district courts to decide if the charges were official or unofficial acts.

Just adds another layer.

[ricks327]

The Dems are going crazy over the ruling including AOC wanting to impeach the Supreme Court justices. :rofl:

[PLRX]

105375

[bsmith]

The Dems are going crazy over the ruling including AOC wanting to impeach the Supreme Court justices. :rofl:

hell, some of the nutjobs are suggesting drone strikes against them and or Trump.

really showing who they are...

[PLRX]

The liberal world is going nuts; it sounds and looks like a fly is trapped in a cobweb.

"help me, help me"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up6g0SDMJ7A&ab_channel=MrKsummer7

[Yadkin]

The Dems are going crazy over the ruling including AOC wanting to impeach the Supreme Court justices. :rofl:

The ones that vote lock step with the liberal agenda should be impeached.

[GrandSportC3]

This won't stop the Dems to come after him..

[Swany00]

ruling for trump is inaccurate, they ruled based off of the law......the problem is there are 3 who feel differently because of their feelings, not the law.

Sotomeyers dissent was 100% political

[Vandelay Industries]

No, not really. It just kicks those cases back down to the district courts to decide if the charges were official or unofficial acts.

Just adds another layer.

Still clinging to hope. :funnier:

[Vandelay Industries]

The "democrat underground" has reached a new level of crazy today:

This means Biden can declare Trump and Justices Alito and Thomas (as a start) to be domestic terrorists and then he can do whatever he wants to eliminate the threat.

:spdchk::Jeff '79::willy:

[6spdC6]

ruling for trump is inaccurate, they ruled based off of the law......the problem is there are 3 who feel differently because of their feelings, not the law.

Sotomeyers dissent was 100% political

Ah yes the wise Latina at work again!

[roadpilot]

The Supreme Court ruled for ALL Presidents and Demacracy.
Separation of Powers. It is bad that after these many years,100's
a ruleing like this had to be made. Common sense. The present
liberal party has lost it and the Supreme Court had to wake them up.

[Frankie the Fink]

Lawfare and Biden are both falling apart and the Democrats back up plan is - uh, errr, anybody know ?

Again do NOT be a bit surprised if fake Judge Merchan sentences Trump to prison on July 11th as I won't be.

[Yadkin]

ruling for trump is inaccurate, they ruled based off of the law......the problem is there are 3 who feel differently because of their feelings, not the law.

Sotomeyers dissent was 100% political

She's the first of three that should be impeached.

[GTOguy]

This won't stop the Dems to come after him..

You'll be able to have a ringside seat to the whole thing....stopped at some wayside truck stop, watching the TV screen over the diner counter as you enjoy your warm meal as your Tesla charges up outside.

Hell, this could be a Norman Rockwell painting!!

[GTOguy]

She's the first of three that should be impeached.

Impeached? How about a public flogging, followed by a tar-and-feathering, and then being run out of town on a rail?

[LATB]

Thank God for Trump’s 3 Supreme Court pics.
And there may very well be more during the next administration.
THAT, if nothing else should persuade the so called conservative never trumpers to vote for him.

[Bill]

Lawfare and Biden are both falling apart and the Democrats back up plan is - uh, errr, anybody know ?

Again do NOT be a bit surprised if fake Judge Merchan sentences Trump to prison on July 11th as I won't be.

Thank God for Trump’s 3 Supreme Court pics.
And there may very well be more during the next administration.
THAT, if nothing else should persuade the so called conservative never trumpers to vote for him.


Thomas will retire if Trump wins. I don't see any of the ladies retiring. Amy Barrett and Jumanji just got there, Kagen isn't that old, and the Wise Latina, having the best medical care your tax money can buy, will live with her diabetes for quite a while. So unless something drastic happens, even if we get Trump in, it will be at best, a push, and only if he replaces Clarence Thomas with an actual conservative, not a wishy washy Kavanaugh or Barrett.

The one that really needs to go is Roberts, and he's not old enough either. Maybe Trump can release is dirt? The adopted kids? Epstein? Got to be something that made him turn from moderate to closet progressive.

[Taurus]

Lawfare and Biden are both falling apart and the Democrats back up plan is - uh, errr, anybody know ?

Again do NOT be a bit surprised if fake Judge Merchan sentences Trump to prison on July 11th as I won't be.

Actually with this ruling there's a chance the sentencing will be moved back as much of the evidence submitted in this case is now outside the scope of today's ruling. The ruling allows this new standard to be proactive if you read the ruling in it's entirety.

This could mean a legal nightmare for many convictions.

[KenHorse]

Actually with this ruling there's a chance the sentencing will be moved back as much of the evidence submitted in this case is now outside the scope of today's ruling. The ruling allows this new standard to be proactive if you read the ruling in it's entirety.

This could mean a legal nightmare for many convictions.

Merchan has already demonstrated he doesn't give a crap about being overturned on appeal. With the other cases against Trump falling apart, the Commucrats are desperate for ANYTHING they can get before November 5th.

So the order has gone out to Merchan to move full throttle to July 11th. Never forget that the DOJ's 2nd in command left to assist Bragg with the Trump persecution

[Bill]

Merchan has already demonstrated he doesn't give a crap about being overturned on appeal. With the other cases against Trump falling apart, the Commucrats are desperate for ANYTHING they can get before November 5th.

So the order has gone out to Merchan to move full throttle to July 11th. Never forget that the DOJ's 2nd in command left to assist Bragg with the Trump persecution

:iagree:

It will be prison, guaranteed. And why not? The NY appeals court and NY Supreme Court won't be of any help, because why would they? They're ideological travelers with Merchan. And the SCotUS? They just let Steve Bannon get screwed, even though this is all obvious lawfare. So don't expect any help from there, at least until Trump gets the ultimatum....we'll let you out if you drop out.

Hochul has probably already been tasked with making that offer.

[Yadkin]

Impeached? How about a public flogging, followed by a tar-and-feathering, and then being run out of town on a rail?

That would turn her into a martyr, and we'd have Independence Day eliminated to make room for Sotomayor Day. :spdchk:

[Bill]

https://www.youtube.com/live/wDzkkRIoZsI

Brandon mumbles for 4 minutes reading a teleprompter, then walks out without answering questions.

https://x.com/MAGAMichelleS69/status/1807933993704104405

Why hasn't anyone on Brandon's staff not figured out that if you write "end of quote" on the teleprompter, Brandon will say "end of quote."

[Vette40th]

The Education system is so deteriorated that many have no idea whats been happening for some time. We have slowly been eroding to socialism. And it does sound awesome to get all these life needs for free. But they dont understand the cost.. Its far heavier than printing money.
The SCOTUS cases are putting the brakes on many issues that have run away, without oversight. Will it matter? Will it be enforced? If Trump gets in, it should start to put a 180 degree rudder on this ship, for a while.

[Bill]

https://media.patriots.win/post/AICsbxxJwThY.jpeg

[Bill]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1807757765655625890

[DDSLT5]

Ok - I'm gonna say it. Elon for President. Now we're talking!!!!

[Aerovette]

I hear "end of quote" said often. Not that Biden isn't a bumbling fool, but this is far from his typical gaffe.

[gs568]

Still clinging to hope. :funnier:

Only morons voted for Biden.

[ZipZap]

:iagree:

It will be prison, guaranteed. And why not? The NY appeals court and NY Supreme Court won't be of any help, because why would they? They're ideological travelers with Merchan. And the SCotUS? They just let Steve Bannon get screwed, even though this is all obvious lawfare. So don't expect any help from there, at least until Trump gets the ultimatum....we'll let you out if you drop out.

Hochul has probably already been tasked with making that offer.

In jail, and Biden drops out to be replaced by someone who can campaign against someone who can't?

Not outside the thought bubble, I'm sure...

Trump can beat Biden from jail.

[A/E]

Double Edge Sword you say ?

Can't Charge Crooked Joe for stuff since he took office . . .

But Guess What ~ all the Sell Out Stuff to All His Crime Family Shell Companies - Happened whilst he was . . . .

Not in Office having his strings pulled by his handlers as the President

Jus Sayin'

[Frankie the Fink]

Practically ends the J6 cases and the Georgia case (that’s basically already dead on the vine)

Of course if Trump was to lose the election they would die anyway. If he wins they will push it all to tie him up as much as possible.

Maybe, but now the local courts get to decide what are "core" Presidential actions vs personal ones per the SCOTUS ruling. I think the persecution army can still game things and how does a local 12 person jury decide the scope of Presidential duties. It IS a win, kinda, sorta - you can bet the lawfare soldiers are already strategizing more BS.

The bogus Jack Smith appointment WAS specifically addressed though, my favorite line ? "No private citizen can criminally prosecute ANYbody"

[Frankie the Fink]

Ok - I'm gonna say it. Elon for President. Now we're talking!!!!

Yeah move from a senile old man to a non native born citizen (disqualifying Elon) with an emotional IQ of a 14 year old. Now, go charge your Tesla battery.

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-doubles-down-challenge-fight-putin-2022-3?op=1

[Vette40th]

Ok - I'm gonna say it. Elon for President. Now we're talking!!!!

He would be ideal, but he was not born here.

[vettemed]

He would be ideal, but he was not born here.

Neither was BHO.

[Vette40th]

Neither was BHO.

I know. And he was a British citizen due to his Father.

[Frankie the Fink]

Boy the left is having one indescribably sh!tty Independence Day week.
So sad and then somebody said Pete Buttigieg would make a great Dem Prez candidate.

That had the coffee squirting out my nose.

[LATB]

Boy the left is having one indescribably sh!tty Independence Day week.
So sad and then somebody said Pete Buttigieg would make a great Dem Prez candidate.

That had the coffee squirting out my nose.

I would not put it past them. They are desperate for a LGBT president. I think they will nominate him as vp.

[Taurus]

Actually with this ruling there's a chance the sentencing will be moved back as much of the evidence submitted in this case is now outside the scope of today's ruling. The ruling allows this new standard to be proactive if you read the ruling in it's entirety.

This could mean a legal nightmare for many convictions.

I called it yesterday, his sentencing has been put on hold.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/manhattan-da-agrees-delay-trump-151505874.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

[Bill]

Boy the left is having one indescribably sh!tty Independence Day week.
So sad and then somebody said Pete Buttigieg would make a great Dem Prez candidate.

That had the coffee squirting out my nose.

Enjoy it. The visuals of Trump being put in handcuffs and frog marched off to Riker's Island will be 24/7 coverage for MONTHS. That's coming next week, bet on it.

[LATB]

I called it yesterday, his sentencing has been put on hold.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/manhattan-da-agrees-delay-trump-151505874.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

I believe that there has been a request to postpone the sentencing. Not sure if that has been granted by the court.

[Taurus]

I believe that there has been a request to postpone the sentencing. Not sure if that has been granted by the court.

Pretty sure it has been. They have no choice the way this ruling is written. Any evidence to prove motive that comes from personal conversations or correspondence by Trump or his advisors is no longer admissible and this ruling was made proactive.

That's the law now on the books for Biden and all future presidents, is that really what we want?

So here's how I think this plays out. Trump never gets sentenced nor does he go to trial for the other indictments, it will take too long to sort out the law and how to apply it. He will most likely get reelected unless the left gets a strong candidate, I don't think they will.

Trump isn't going to use this ruling to be a dictator, he's not that stupid. The left needs to just settle down. This was and always has been a get of jail free card. He gets in office but the backlash will give both the house and senate to the dems and nothing gets accomplished in the next 4 years.

We all need to start thinking about 2028, this cycle is pretty much toast after this past 7 days.

[Aerovette]

Pretty sure it has been. They have no choice the way this ruling is written. Any evidence to prove motive that comes from personal conversations or correspondence by Trump or his advisors is no longer admissible and this ruling was made proactive.

That's the law now on the books for Biden and all future presidents, is that really what we want?

So here's how I think this plays out. Trump never gets sentenced nor does he go to trial for the other indictments, it will take too long to sort out the law and how to apply it. He will most likely get reelected unless the left gets a strong candidate, I don't think they will.

Trump isn't going to use this ruling to be a dictator, he's not that stupid. The left needs to just settle down. This was and always has been a get of jail free card. He gets in office but the backlash will give both the house and senate to the dems and nothing gets accomplished in the next 4 years.

We all need to start thinking about 2028, this cycle is pretty much toast after this past 7 days.

I don't see how is ruling impacts anything Stormy related. All of that activity was prior to him being in office.

[Frankie the Fink]

I would not put it past them. They are desperate for a LGBT president. I think they will nominate him as vp.

I'm not sure 'ole Pete wasn't the "ghost rider" in that little gay tryst in the Senate hearing room... In ant event Pete is clearly hole-y qualified ...

[LATB]

Pretty sure it has been. They have no choice the way this ruling is written. Any evidence to prove motive that comes from personal conversations or correspondence by Trump or his advisors is no longer admissible and this ruling was made proactive.

That's the law now on the books for Biden and all future presidents, is that really what we want?

So here's how I think this plays out. Trump never gets sentenced nor does he go to trial for the other indictments, it will take too long to sort out the law and how to apply it. He will most likely get reelected unless the left gets a strong candidate, I don't think they will.

Trump isn't going to use this ruling to be a dictator, he's not that stupid. The left needs to just settle down. This was and always has been a get of jail free card. He gets in office but the backlash will give both the house and senate to the dems and nothing gets accomplished in the next 4 years.

We all need to start thinking about 2028, this cycle is pretty much toast after this past 7 days.

I think the Trump win will carry the house and senate as republican wins.

[Taurus]

I don't see how is ruling impacts anything Stormy related. All of that activity was prior to him being in office.

Because the evidence that was made up of personal conversations between he and his associates is no longer admissible under the new ruling. This means the recordings between he and Cohen for example are out. Additionally, SCOTUS made the ruling retroactive.

[Taurus]

I think the Trump win will carry the house and senate as republican wins.

Why? Did you not see what happened in 2018, 2020 and 2022?

[Onebadcad]

No, not really. It just kicks those cases back down to the district courts to decide if the charges were official or unofficial acts.

Just adds another layer.

Here is the issue, the decison by SCOTUS was a confirmation of that which has already been the law, and been in place for over 200 years.

It had to be addressed by SCOTUS as lefties have weaponized the doj, fbi and our ENTIRE judicial systems.
Had the courts been adherent to this law, there would have been NO indictments against TRUMP.

You are correct in stating it just kicks it back to the lower courts, AND the SCOTUS will have to overturn any convictions, as you and I know the lefties have their own laws, which have nothing to do with OUR CONSTITUTION.

EXAMPLES:
chuckie intimidates the SCOTUS
fjb ignores SCOTUS ruling on student loans
fjb has an evening press conference to solely address SCOTUS decision

I have thousands more, anytime the SCOTUS rules in favor of OUR CONSTITUTION the leftists nutjobs raise hell and challenge their authority AND threaten more judges to shift the balance.

Amazing that when a SCOTUS decision goes their way, those on the right accept it, and do not threaten extreme actions.

[Aerovette]

Prepare to have 13 Justices.

[Taurus]

Here is the issue, the decison by SCOTUS was a confirmation of that which has already been the law, and been in place for over 200 years.

It had to be addressed by SCOTUS as lefties have weaponized the doj, fbi and our ENTIRE judicial systems.
Had the courts been adherent to this law, there would have been NO indictments against TRUMP.

You are correct in stating it just kicks it back to the lower courts, AND the SCOTUS will have to overturn any convictions, as you and I know the lefties have their own laws, which have nothing to do with OUR CONSTITUTION.

EXAMPLES:
chuckie intimidates the SCOTUS
fjb ignores SCOTUS ruling on student loans
fjb has an evening press conference to solely address SCOTUS decision

I have thousands more, anytime the SCOTUS rules in favor of OUR CONSTITUTION the leftists nutjobs raise hell and challenge their authority AND threaten more judges to shift the balance.

Amazing that when a SCOTUS decision goes their way, those on the right accept it, and do not threaten extreme actions.

So to be clear, Biden weaponizing DOJ is bad if it happened, giving the all future presidents the power to do so is good?

I agree with presidential immunity, we don't need a president hesitating to make a decision. I think the rest may be a bit of an over reach.

[KenHorse]

So to be clear, Biden weaponizing DOJ is bad if it happened, giving the all future presidents the power to do so is good?



That's a flat out lie. The SCOTUS ruling does no such thing

[Vandelay Industries]

So to be clear, Biden weaponizing DOJ is bad if it happened, giving the all future presidents the power to do so is good?

I agree with presidential immunity, we don't need a president hesitating to make a decision. I think the rest may be a bit of an over reach.

Please cite the paragraph in the ruling which allows that.

[GrandSportC3]

Prepare to have 13 Justices.

Actually, may not be a bad idea. After the election, it's possible that GOP will have the Presidency and the Senate. Expand the court to 20 justices and have Trump fill them all :D

[LATB]

Why? Did you not see what happened in 2018, 2020 and 2022?

A lot has changed since then.

[Onebadcad]

So to be clear, Biden weaponizing DOJ is bad if it happened, giving the all future presidents the power to do so is good?

I agree with presidential immunity, we don't need a president hesitating to make a decision. I think the rest may be a bit of an over reach.

That's a flat out lie. The SCOTUS ruling does no such thing

Ken, as per usual, is correct.

I would think based on your admission you would be very concerned with all things fjb has done with the doj and courts, while ignoring SCOTUS and holding press conferences to intimidate them.

Thomas Jefferson foresaw these times, and gave SCOTUS the power and authority not to cave to political pressures.

fjb, chuckie and the like should ALL be brought up on charges of treason, as they have crossed the line, multiple times.

[Onebadcad]

Prepare to have 13 Justices.

The socialists can try this, TRUMP will negate it on JAN 20, 2025!!

[KenHorse]

Ken, as per usual, is correct.

I would think based on your admission you would be very concerned with all things fjb has done with the doj and courts, while ignoring SCOTUS and holding press conferences to intimidate them.

Thomas Jefferson foresaw these times, and gave SCOTUS the power and authority not to cave to political pressures.

fjb, chuckie and the like should ALL be brought up on charges of treason, as they have crossed the line, multiple times.

Unlike some, I actually read the SCOTUS ruling (it's only like 5 pages long). Damn straight I'm right :D

[KenHorse]

By the way, if ANYONE on the Court should be impeached, it should be the wise Latina. She clearly demonstrated she doesn't belong on the Court and has no knowledge of the Constitution

[Onebadcad]

By the way, if ANYONE on the Court should be impeached, it should be the wise Latina. She clearly demonstrated she doesn't belong on the Court and has no knowledge of the Constitution

I think we all know the long-time goal of socialists is not to place those on SCOUTS with a respect AND understanding of OUR CONSTITUTION, but rather to only nominate those who will make decisions based on what THEIR politicians want.

The LAW of OUR COUNTRY is good, it does not require personal interpretation that benefits a single party.

[Onebadcad]

Actually, may not be a bad idea. After the election, it's possible that GOP will have the Presidency and the Senate. Expand the court to 20 justices and have Trump fill them all :D

I have always liked your politics, AND YOUR CORVETTES :cert:!!

[Frankie the Fink]

I called it yesterday, his sentencing has been put on hold.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/manhattan-da-agrees-delay-trump-151505874.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

As I've said elsewhere, the closer the sentencing (jail time perhaps) to Nov 4th the more impactful it will be on the election - Bragg/Merchan aren't doing Trump any favors.

[Onebadcad]

As I've said elsewhere, the closer the sentencing (jail time perhaps) to Nov 4th the more impactful it will be on the election - Bragg/Merchan aren't doing Trump any favors.

I am with you, the best TRUMP action would be for the appeal to be won ASAP, thus stopping the sentencing phase.
If not, the fraudulent judge will be more than happy to sentence TRUMP within a month or two of the election, knowing an appeal for the sentencing would not be heard until after Election Day.

[6spdC6]

By the way, if ANYONE on the Court should be impeached, it should be the wise Latina. She clearly demonstrated she doesn't belong on the Court and has no knowledge of the Constitution

Dam you think that is bad the affirmative action bitch Biden put on not only does not know the constitution she does even know what denotes a woman!:mad:

[DDSLT5]

The "democrat underground" has reached a new level of crazy today:

This means Biden can declare Trump and Justices Alito and Thomas (as a start) to be domestic terrorists and then he can do whatever he wants to eliminate the threat.

:spdchk::Jeff '79::willy:

Democrat underground indeed. Crazy mofos!!!!

[Taurus]

That's a flat out lie. The SCOTUS ruling does no such thing

Right. I have read the ruling as well and the president could absolutely manipulate the DOJ. He could offer an incentive to prosecute and that conversation could not be used as evidence of a crime. Don’t be so naïve.

[KenHorse]

Right. I have read the ruling as well and the president could absolutely manipulate the DOJ. He could offer an incentive to prosecute and that conversation could not be used as evidence of a crime. Don’t be so naïve.

Naivete' has nothing to do with it.

However, that you made this claim that you now have, proves you haven't read their ruling, regardless what you claim.

Such an act on the POTUS's part is clearly beyond the scope of his/her's Constitutional authority and therefore prosecutable after leaving office

[Will]

I didn't like the decision, but I expected it to be this way in order to get a solid majority.

IMHO the best decision would have been much simpler - the constitution explicitly lays out the way in which a President is NOT above the law and can be held accountable - via impeachment by the U.S. House and conviction and removal by the Senate. The end. The U.S. Constitution explicitly made Congress the court of law which has jurisdiction over POTUS. It's unusual since Congress isn't a court, but it's all there in plain english. And it makes total sense. If the normal state and Federal court systems have jurisdiction over POTUS, then POTUS can be essentially hamstrung by political blackmail.

[Tikiman]

Ken, as per usual, is correct.

I would think based on your admission you would be very concerned with all things fjb has done with the doj and courts, while ignoring SCOTUS and holding press conferences to intimidate them.

Thomas Jefferson foresaw these times, and gave SCOTUS the power and authority not to cave to political pressures.

fjb, chuckie and the like should ALL be brought up on charges of treason, as they have crossed the line, multiple times.


'

[Vandelay Industries]

Right. I have read the ruling as well and the president could absolutely manipulate the DOJ. He could offer an incentive to prosecute and that conversation could not be used as evidence of a crime. Don’t be so naïve.

Please cite the paragraph in the ruling which allows that.


:popcorns:

[Vandelay Industries]

Naivete' has nothing to do with it.

However, that you made this claim that you now have, proves you haven't read their ruling, regardless what you claim.

Such an act on the POTUS's part is clearly beyond the scope of his/her's Constitutional authority and therefore prosecutable after leaving office


Once again, he's just parroting CNN & MSNBC.:spdchk:

[LATB]

Once again, he's just parroting CNN & MSNBC.:spdchk:

A true Biden voting conservative. :willy:

[Bill]

https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1808214014209700177

[VITE1]

This

[LATB]

https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1808214014209700177

"If such is still necessary" :Jeff '79:

[Taurus]

Naivete' has nothing to do with it.

However, that you made this claim that you now have, proves you haven't read their ruling, regardless what you claim.

Such an act on the POTUS's part is clearly beyond the scope of his/her's Constitutional authority and therefore prosecutable after leaving office

Ken, I have read it and you completely miss my point. I'm not talking about what is done either as an official act or otherwise. My point is there would be no way to prosecute him if he decided to do this behind the scenes no matter if he was caught or not. The ruling says that any private conversations between the president and/or his associates can NOT be used to prove motive. There would be no point of law to bring a case.

I fully understand what is within the scope of POTUS, I'm talking about should he try to do what people keep accusing Biden of doing.

[KenHorse]

Ken, I have read it and you completely miss my point. I'm not talking about what is done either as an official act or otherwise. My point is there would be no way to prosecute him if he decided to do this behind the scenes no matter if he was caught or not. The ruling says that any private conversations between the president and/or his associates can NOT be used to prove motive. There would be no point of law to bring a case.

I fully understand what is within the scope of POTUS, I'm talking about should he try to do what people keep accusing Biden of doing.

That's reaching to say the least. If it was a secret and no one but the POTUS and the person they conspired with ever found out, OF COURSE there'd be no prosecution. With or without this current SCOTUS ruling :rolleyes:

In the case of Biden, the evidence is overwhelming, right down to their coordination with Bragg and Fannie whatshername (as proven by WH log visits) so hell ya, that is beyond Constitutional authority

[Vandelay Industries]

A true Biden voting conservative. :willy:

It's kind of sad the way he still tries to sell that. :Jeff '79:

[Vette40th]

We need some new George , Thomas, types to just fix everything asap..

[LATB]

It's kind of sad the way he still tries to sell that. :Jeff '79:

I’d be embarrassed to admit that I voted for Biden.

[Vandelay Industries]

I’d be embarrassed to admit that I voted for Biden.

And if that's not bad enough, make it clear you're ready to do it again. Then act like it puts you on some moral high ground...

[Raazor]

Trump is on a crazy winning streak!

[Frankie the Fink]

That's reaching to say the least. If it was a secret and no one but the POTUS and the person they conspired with ever found out, OF COURSE there'd be no prosecution. With or without this current SCOTUS ruling :rolleyes:

In the case of Biden, the evidence is overwhelming, right down to their coordination with Bragg and Fannie whatshername (as proven by WH log visits) so hell ya, that is beyond Constitutional authority

Joe is a master of keeping an "arm's length" distance from nefarious acts. In his family business dealings, lawfare, etc - anything illicit. Like the WH meetings with Fani, Bragg, and Wade (who brings some 3rd rate slip and fall gov't contract lawyer to a WH meeting) and then having your #3 DOJ guy take a 5 step downgrade to prosecute a state case.

The WH meetings with Fani, Bragg

[Vette40th]

People relly need to ask, What are you voting for.. Dems want 100 percent control of your life. They want to take care of you, using fiat money.. Not good
The right, wants to tell you you are free etc, but wont do much to stop the left. Short and sweet, out government needs reigning in.

[Frankie the Fink]

People relly need to ask, What are you voting for.. Dems want 100 percent control of your life. They want to take care of you, using fiat money.. Not good
The right, wants to tell you you are free etc, but wont do much to stop the left. Short and sweet, out government needs reigning in.

We have a uniparty now, many examples, like BOTH parties refusing to pass a bill to have independent accounting and oversight in the billions of taxpayer money sent to the Ukraine - a watershed moment IMO.

[KenHorse]

Joe is a master of keeping an "arm's length" distance from nefarious acts. In his family business dealings, lawfare, etc - anything illicit. Like the WH meetings with Fani, Bragg, and Wade (who brings some 3rd rate slip and fall gov't contract lawyer to a WH meeting) and then having your #3 DOJ guy take a 5 step downgrade to prosecute a state case.

The WH meetings with Fani, Bragg

When dealing with certain people, I try to remember they're the embodiment of the old axiom "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit"

[Bill]

https://media.scored.co/post/S9A6yvFTeQqD.png

[6spdC6]

https://media.scored.co/post/S9A6yvFTeQqD.png

You can figure that CNN has a serious load of bullshit and loved to spread it around.
FWIW many, many times its so bad its rather funny!